User talk:DanielJanko/Stroke rehabilitation

Peer-review of Stoke Recovery article. 1. Weird citation in "history of stroke neuro-rehabilitation" right at the end of the first sentence. 2. Under "current perspectives and therapeutic avenues" in the sub-header "motor re-learning" this needs to be a full, grammatically correct sentence. It also needs some more description as well. 3. Under "current perspectives and therapeutic avenues" in the sub-header "constraint-induced movement therapy" the sentence "in 1918, this study was published, but it received little attention" is a bit distracting from the main point. 3a. Citation 17 needs to be updated to a more reliable medical source, if there is one. 4. Under "current perspectives and therapeutic avenues" in the sub-header "mental practice/mental imagery" there should be some more description of what goes into this technique. 4a. Citation 19 needs to be updated to a more reliable medical source, if there is one. 5. Under "training of muscles affected by the upper motor neuron syndrome" citation 65 needs to be updated to a more reliable medical source, if there is one. Additionally, Wikipedia failed to verify it. 6. Under "training of muscles affected by the upper motor neuron syndrome" in the sub-header "physiotherapy" citation 73 needs to be updated to a more reliable medical source, if there is one.SkyM99 (talk) 23:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Sky

Hey Sky, thank you for your feedback. I will look into and edit all the things you have pointed out. I didn't pay that much attention to the cited sources so this is definitely a big help for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielJanko (talk • contribs) 15:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)