User talk:DanielRigal

Mark Fisher/Russell Brand
About a third of the essay Exiting the Vampires Castle is about Russell Brand, and I do still think that's worth noting. But I think you are right that Mark Fisher's support a long time ago might be misconstrued. So I have added an explanatory footnote that makes it clear that the essay was published long before accusations were made against Mr Brand. I hope that is acceptable. Best wishes. 182.153.95.138 (talk) 07:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

The Fani Willis IP
The IP did lodge a complaint on ANI, but I reverted it for being such nonsense, and not even being in its own section.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 22:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I missed that when I was looking at the whole /64. By the time I did see it it was a moot issue. One of these days I'll get my head around IPv6 properly. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Was just coming here to say exactly what said. Thanks Liliana for laughing the comment off of ANI and thank you Daniel for reporting the IPv6. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

David Lammy
Hello, as you have omitted your objection upon reviewing other articles, I shall wait for a few days to observe whether other editors offer comments. If no comments are forthcoming, I will proceed with the edit, ensuring alignment with similar articles featuring UK MPs such as Keir Starmer, Angela Rayner, and Ed Miliband. Erzan (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It's an RfC so I think it has to run its course. That's a few days. Somebody else, uninvolved, will come along and close it saying what the outcome was. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * RFC says "the participants in the discussion determine what they have agreed on and try to implement their agreement" and "When a discussion has naturally ended, you should consider ending the RfC"
 * I will wait to see if any other editors object. If not, I will make the edit. Erzan (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your deletion from Time Cube
Regarding this deletion – what would it take for the song to be worth noting? It's obviously relevant to the page. The band is not as famous as Alestorm, but the album containing the song was published by TVT Records, and the artist had a song in the first Rock Band (video game). ~ JoshDuffMan (talk) 15:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I think it might be OK if the band had an article and it would definitely be OK if a Reliable Source had commented on it. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The band's existence is noted on List of songs in Rock Band. If the genius.com reference is good enough for Alestorm, I think it's good enough for Honest Bob.  I'm going to put the paragraph back for now ~ JoshDuffMan (talk) 15:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm still not sure about this but I'm not going to push it. We can see if anybody else objects. DanielRigal (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Updation of Atlas Copco
I am a representative at Atlas Copco Group and wish many updates for our company page. I also observed that a few weeks back, there was a discussion regarding the deletion of our company’s page, and I sincerely appreciate your efforts in advocating for its retention. Given your familiarity with the page and Wikipedia’s guidelines, I am reaching out to seek your guidance and assistance in updating and improving the content of our company’s page. I understand the importance of neutrality and adherence to Wikipedia’s policies, and I aim to ensure that any updates made are accurate and well-sourced. Could you kindly guide me on the best way to proceed with this? If you have any specific suggestions or would be willing to assist directly, I would greatly appreciate it.

Merlinantony (talk) 11:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * To be honest, there is no easy way to navigate this because of WP:COI. I think the best thing to do is make suggestions on the Talk page of the article rather than make edits to the article yourself (unless it is 100% uncontroversial things like correcting spelling or reverting blatant vandalism). You should also follow the disclosure instructions at WP:DISCLOSE. The biggest problem with the article at the moment is the way that much of it is sourced to internal company publications. If you can suggest alternative, independent, sources then please suggest those on the Talk page. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Daniel. I can suggest a few alternatives for the sources. However, the main update here is that Atlas Copco Group has a new visual and operational Identity. Hence the name of the article has to be "Atlas Copco Group" instead of Atlas Copco. (Atlas Copco is now a brand under the group). The logo and images to be changed too
 * https://view.news.eu.nasdaq.com/view?id=b1e5869947864abad8123e504ffc09663&lang=en&src=micro
 * https://www.electronicspecifier.com/news/atlas-copco-group-s-new-brand-identity
 * https://www.worldpumps.com/content/news/atlas-copco-names-next-president-and-ceo/
 * Atlas Copco (companieshistory.com)
 * http://ct.moreover.com/?a=53650214449&p=1yx&v=1&x=0FWb0o2inbiioYg_Uk0TYg
 * Merlinantony (talk) 07:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Requested move for Twitter article

 * Simple Attention.svg Your opinion on this issue is requested

You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 06:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi Daniel :) I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 17:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Critical Theory
Is there any chance you could revert the apparent Frankfurt School conspiracy theory subscriber who keeps inserting "Jewish" into Critical Theory, against consensus? And maybe file a 3RRN filing if needed, or talk to an uninvolved admin? I don't have the bandwidth at the moment. Newimpartial (talk) 23:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry. Only just seen this. It looks like they are already blocked and that ClueBot has latched on their bad edits too so hopefully it will revert any socks trying the same thing. DanielRigal (talk) 23:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that belatedly. I had started looking for an active editor who was aware of the context for the bad edits, but as it turned out I didn't post on your page until the fire was over (for now). Newimpartial (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)