User talk:DanielRigal/2007

SCSI revesrion
Well why in hell dont you edit my contributions instead of reverting, it needs to be updated because of the prevelance of SATA, but you did a revert. IS that because you have NO IDEA, of the sweep that SATA has made of the Sun and smaller server market  ? Sure, mainframes (IBM) and some enterprises may have SCSI as  a standard, its still available .. but a comparison of units sold would be telling ?

why the hell didnt you add references to prove your "knowledge" ?? eg scsi units shipped ? I contend in the last year thats vanishinly small !

Here, I will help you, a refernce http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_disk SCSI drives fell behind SATA in 2005. Look at bottom right, its 2007. The entry for Hard_Disk is not a prediction.

Why the hell dont you look inside a sun box model ,that achieves good sales ? Units sold again, not just 'existence'. what do you find ? SATA drives.

Why he hell didnt you find references to a commonly available SCSI drive that is larger than 300 gigabytes. (How can I provide a reference to something which doesnt exist ? ) Look at the price of 300 gig drives SATA vs SCSI.

WHy the hell dont you terminate your involvement in wiki edittimg, you obviously have no idea about much, except how to click "revert".

Note: The above unsigned comment was added by User:203.82.182.242.


 * I am sorry that you are so angry I do not see why your message has to be so rude. Your edit was largely inaccurate. I was at work and I didn't have time to edit it extensively. I made a decision that the old version was better then the version with your edits so I reverted it. I appreciate that there may have been some good elements to your edit and I hope you will bring those back. Obviously, there is nothing wrong with saying that SATA is more popular than SCSI now. Everybody know that this is true, but it is totally untrue to say that SCSI is only used in Mainframes. Only a couple of months ago I bought a very small HP server with SCSI disks for £500. SCSI is not dead at the low end of the PC server market, even if SATA is more common. Finally may I say that I take great exception to your comment "WHy the hell dont you terminate your involvement in wiki edittimg". I think this, and your general tone, says a lot more about you than it does about me. Please try to calm down and consider these things based on their merits rather than getting too possessive about your edits. If you continue in this tone I will have to complain and I would rather not have to do this. --DanielRigal 09:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Tottenham & Forest Gate Railway
Hey Daniel, just a line to say thanks for writing the Tottenham & Forest Gate Railway article. I've wanted for a long time to get one started but have never got around to it. I was very pleased to see that you have now done so. I think it would preferable if some images could be found for your article. Do you have any? I'll also have a look around to see if I can come up with any. --IsarSteve 20:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I am afraid I don't have any pictures. All I did was cobble some stuff together from the two sources referenced. My thinking was that anything is better then nothing and that, once the article was started, other people might add to it. --DanielRigal 21:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Dealing with hoaxes (section title was originally "!")
Please do not revert my actions. The articles I have cleared are purely fictional. before I nominate them for deletion, I cannot allow people learning fabrications, and taking them in as history. Odst 00:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry but you need to explain what you are doing. When I see a page blanked without explanation I assume it is vandalism. Please explain what you are doing in a few words and put the appropriate deletion tags on. That way there won't be any further misunderstandings. I don't think you actually need to blank out the content anyway. If you put the deletion tags on and explain that the article is untrue that should be sufficent. People will know that they can't trust it. --DanielRigal 00:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

John Johnson (conductor)
My page is not nonsense!!!!! It is completely true. Prove it otherwise! I dare you! (Unsigned comment by User:John4890)


 * Sorry, but it clearly is nonsense and this is an encyclopedia not a playground. The responsibility is on you to demonstrate that your content is meaningful and correct. You should do this by citing references which back up your edits.--DanielRigal 01:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I can't believe you, I'm just a 40 year old trying to make ends meet. (Unsigned comment by User:68.36.164.49)


 * Do you have nothing better to do then to edit wikipedia? (Unsigned comment by User:68.36.164.49)


 * That is a good question. Yes. I do have some better things to do but I try to find time for Wikipedia because it is good to do something for the greater good of the World rather than just watch TV and get drunk. I believe that giving the World a Free encyclopedia is a truly great thing to do and will have far reaching benefits for many millions of people. I want to help as much as I can, even if it is only in a small way. Now, can I ask you a question? Do you have nothing better to do then to try to mess up wikipedia? Surely you can think of something positive to contribute? --DanielRigal 00:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Nuissance Candidate
In the Eliseo Soriano entry, I added that he is independent candidate when he run as senator. That addition would make the whole entry complete. Without such post, it would look very intriguing and not very much faithful to the nature of encyclopedic entries. As encyclopedias should be, there must be little questions or intrigue left to the minds of the people or reader. --Julianmakabayan 15:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Mole in the Ground
Thanks for the referrence! I just wrote the article today, and did plan to expand it.Pustelnik 19:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Tags on Political positions of Chris Dodd
Would you please share your concerns on the talk page? I'm not sure what would set this article apart from similar ones on other Presidential candidates, such as Political positions of Hillary Clinton, or Political positions of Fred Thompson, or any of the dozen of other articles on the political positions of other politicians. -- Kendrick7talk 19:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Just writing something now. It will be there in a few minutes. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

MEPI
Hi. You tagged my stub, Middle East Peace Initiative, and I pretty much agree with the tags. As the article stands, there's not much there (hence my own stub tag).

I have suggested that this article or section be merged with Universal Peace Federation. If I don't find the time to flesh out the article sufficiently, I'll probably go ahead and do the merge.

But what do you think? --Uncle Ed (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes. That makes sense. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)