User talk:DanielWilson1997

Welcome to Wikipedia!
- Welcome-

Bradford Alhambra
Hello, Daniel.

I have removed the information you added to Bradford Alhambra for three reasons:
 * 1) The most important one is that it is unsourced. All information in Wikipedia should be referenced to reliable, independent published sources. It is true that nothing in that article is sourced at present, and if your addition did not have other problems, I might have left it in for the moment; but if/when the article gets rewritten, I cannot see that information surviving for the reasons below.
 * 2) It is time-bound: it may be true now, at the end of 2010, but will not be in 2011 and was not in 2009 (I guess: I haven't checked, maybe it was true in 2009? but even if so, an article shouldn't have a statement that applies to a particular year without saying so. See WP:MOS).
 * 3) It is a rather random piece of information about the subject, which does not really add to it as an encyclopaedic article. (There is other information in the article which is subject to the same criticism, and if I get time I may do some tidying).

I hope that this experience does not put you off editing Wikipedia: your willingness to improve it is very much appreciated, and that article is crying out for improvement. I you can research the Alhambra, and get some solid, referenced information to add to the article, that would be wonderful. --ColinFine (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * (Later) OK, I see Billy Pearce has been in it for the last five years. But it is still time bound, even if not in the scale of one year. --ColinFine (talk)}~

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paul Hudson, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Paul Hudson was changed by DanielWilson1997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.839027 on 2010-11-16T19:04:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Hudson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ColinFine (talk) 23:38, 16 November 2010 (UTC)