User talk:Daniel Gebrim

Speedy deletion of João Cosac
A tag has been placed on João Cosac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Shell   babelfish 00:35, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simone Cosac Naify
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Simone Cosac Naify, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, non-notable BLP, notability isn't inherited by association.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  MBisanz  talk 04:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Telequartz
I noticed you replaced the link to greatmining.com in the external links section of this article. Since the page you link to is nothing more than a list of three names, I'm not sure how this adds any encyclopedic information to the article. You also added a link to the Minerals Yearbook 1988 - this doesn't seem to have any information about the subject of the article, so again, I'm unsure why you added it to the article. You might want to review the guidelines listed at WP:EL to understand the kinds of links that are typically accepted. If you feel the links you added meet those criteria, can you let me know? Otherwise, its likely that they'll be removed again. Shell  babelfish 00:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)