User talk:Daniel Gosser

The article Nixle has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nixle
A tag has been placed on Nixle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 23:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: NIXLE
Looking through the deleted version of Nixle I noticed that the only listed source that mentioned the company's name was the company founder's personal webpage. Further checks found that Google News lists no articles about this company and Yahoo! Finance has no information on this organization. Based on these findings, I see nothing to differentiate NIXLE from the multitude of other small businesses that exist but lack encyclopedic notability. Please see Notability (organizations and companies) for further details.

If you wish to see an article about this company survive then the first step is finding reliable sources independent of NIXLE that actually provide information about the company (see Verifiability). Without these sources the it is highly unlikely that an article on this organization will survive. You should also be aware that repeated attempts to add articles on organizations that fail to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion can be viewed as advertising or self-promotion. --Allen3 talk 01:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Craig mitnick has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —— Ryan   |   t   •   c   23:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I see that. That page is not needed. Thanks.scorsese (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:C.Mitnick.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:C.Mitnick.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

What copyright tag should I use?
Hello, I have uploaded the photo as well as. The images were taken down due to a question of copyright and license. Both images are a headshot used by CBS and NewsCorp entities. It is available publicly and it is not copyrighted. What tag should I use?? scorsese (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Update
The image files that will be used for this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:C.Mitnick.gif http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:C.Mitnick Wiki.jpg

Have been permitted for use on Wikipedia by the author of the image. The permission message has been forwarded to the OTRS. Please tag this article as well as the above images with this template:

This will provide evidence that the e-mail was received, clearing the status of the item in question.

Providing the link to the OTRS ticket number is essential for easy verification.

THANK YOU! Danny Gosser (talk) 16:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:080501 Microsite8 01.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:080501 Microsite8 01.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NIXLE LOGO.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:NIXLE LOGO.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Craig Over White.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Craig Over White.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 18:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Talkback
Skarebo (talk) 22:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there Daniel Gosser, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Daniel Gosser. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo hdr1.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo hdr1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Craig Mitnick


The article Craig Mitnick has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a promotional puff article of non-notable lawyer. The sole potential basis for notability is the single line 'Mitnick was contracted as an on-air legal analyst for Fox News Channel, Fox Radio Network, and CBS,' and that's not sufficient. The quasi-recognitions are either specious ('Lawyers of Distinction', for example, is a marketing scheme that once got fooled into naming a dog a 'lawyer of distinction'; but they got paid) or simple bar association memberships."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 01:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Daniel Gosser


A tag has been placed on User:Daniel Gosser, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TJRC (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Craig Mitnick for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Mitnick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Craig Mitnick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TJRC (talk) 23:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nixle


A tag has been placed on Nixle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drmies (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Daniel Gosser. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)