User talk:Daniel Lawrence

Hi Daniel,

Sorry for the obstruction. As explained in my email reply, it looks like you are unfortunately sharing an IP address with an anonymous vandal at User:82.3.32.75. That anonymous IP has previously made plenty of fine edits relating to the Singapore Navy in the past, but that was probably a different person. I'm guessing this IP is shared between several people on the same ISP. I've lifted the block early so that you can carry on editing. -- Solipsist 16:45, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for removing that ban. It seems highly likely that my ISP shares out IPs, as you suggested.  If this happens again in the future, or continues to happen, what would be the best plan of action?  Daniel Lawrence 18:01, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * At the moment, there is no perfect solution, but I believe the developers are looking into one. The interim solution is to put a notice about the shared IP on the IP-user page, so that other editors are aware of the problem in case further blocks are necessary (for example User talk:210.0.177.84). Do you know the name of the ISP, school or business which might be using this address? It looks like it might be an NTL proxy. -- Solipsist 10:25, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * NTL is the ISP. I don't know about their policies of assigning IPs, but it seems to me that they're shared, and often changed.  Not brilliant, is it.  Makes me wonder what would happen if the British Phonographic Industry or similar wanted to prosecute someone for illegally downloading, for example.  I don't know how they'd get the right person, or more importantly, avoid getting the wrong person.


 * And thanks for the welcome. Very kind.  Daniel Lawrence 10:56, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Solipsist 00:31, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Edit summary
Dear contributor, first I would like to say a big thank you for your time, care, and enthusiasm in editing Wikipedia articles. I hope you find it just as much fun as I do.

I am writing with a small suggestion. I wonder if you could write an edit summary every time you make changes to an article (or when you start a new one). Even a short summary helps. To see how often you have done so in the past, you may go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=YOUR USERNAME.

Edit summaries are important for a number of reasons. Every time you change an article, a record of that change propagates to every single person who has that article on their watchlist. Most people have an article on their watchlist because they care a lot about it, so they would like to be informed about what is going on with it. Accurate summaries help people decide whether it is worthwhile for them to check a change. This is why your edit summary, which will take you maybe 15 seconds, is a time-saver and a great act of candor to the other people interested in the same article as you. Accurate edit summaries are important because they create trust regarding your contributions and help resolve disputes.

There are other, very convincing reasons for putting an edit summary. More information is available at Edit summary. If at any point you have any questions about this rule (or anything else for that matter), please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you and happy editing! Hyacinth 23:51, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Actually, if you went to Edit summary, you would find that you should:
 * "Always fill the summary field. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Accurate summaries help people decide whether it is worthwhile for them to check a change. Summaries often pique the interest of Wikipedians with an expertise in the area. This may not be as necessary for "minor changes", but (e.g.) "fixed spelling" would be nice even then."
 * Forgetting or neglecting to provide edit summaries is counterproductive. Hyacinth 20:03, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I did not send the request to you randomly, nor did I just happen to notice a blank edit summary on my watchlist. The specific edit was:. Thanks. Hyacinth 20:10, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The Hoobs
The 'bias' template isn't appropriate for this article, especially as you're added no explanation on the Talk page. The gushing tone should be dealt with by the cleanup & wikification. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 21:57, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what more I can say. It's an overenthusuastic article about a children's television programme, probably written by a child.  I felt bad enopugh putting the 'cleanup' &amp; 'wikify' templates on it, and I plan to do the work myself as soon as possible; 'bias' is overkill. Mel Etitis  ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 22:01, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Posting Copyvios
Daniel- apologies if you know this, but make sure to post links on WP:CP when you flag something as copyvio. Just doing the squiggle-bracket tag in the article itself does not post it to the copyvio page (I was making the same mistake until a few days ago). Feco 20:56, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * yeah... the text makes you think it was an automatic-post. Sadly, no luck. We've been spoiled by the {}, which usually do something cool and automated.Feco
 * I've now made a suggestion at Template_talk:Copyvio to change the text of the template warning to be less confusing and remind users that they must manually post to WP:CP.Feco

Cassius
Since I made the change without discussion, and since it was lack of discussion I that I objected to, I will revert it. The original change, however, was still made without appropriate discussion, as no discussion of the proposed move took place on the page's talk page. If such courtesy had been shown, I and possibly others could have registered our objection to such a move, as "Cassius" refers far more often to Caesar's assassin than to any other meaning, and in accordance with Disambiguation should therefore carry a disambiguation notice at its top, linking either directly to the other articles in question or to a disambiguation page.

Of course, as you apparently did not note (but could have had pointed out, had you proposed your page move on the article's talk page), Gaius Cassius Longinus already has such a notice at its top, linking to Cassia (gens), which contains a list of a number of other Romans named "Cassius", all notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopaedia but nevertheless, like the band Cassius, are far less well-known than the assassin&mdash;and who were not listed on your disambiguation page, either as a group or by a link to the Cassia article.

Regardless of the disambiguation updates you made (though your diligence is greatly appreciated), Cassius remains better as a redirect because


 * 1) When a Wikipedia reader types the word "Cassius" in the search box, they should go directly to the article on the assassin, as that's by far the most likely article they're looking for.
 * 2) Links to Cassius are going to continue to be created in other articles, as users expect it work in accordance with Naming conventions (ancient Romans) and because it has worked for years.

I also fail to see why you would assume that User:Mark's acceptance of the change would constitute acceptance by anyone else. Binabik80 23:27, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Pocket Dragons
Yay! Thanks for letting me know - thats nifty, and a good start too. I had thought of doing a pocket dragons page, but I get overly excited about it and start to take pictures of all my dragons, then I start to envision a Pocket Dragon WikiProject happening, then articles for each individual dragon along with Category:Pocket Dragons, then I get overwhelmed and give up :)  I'll certainly watch this and expand it some soon.  - Trysha 16:58, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Short articles
Hi, I noticed some of your new articles, like Daddies, Paxo, and Bisto. Without much context, I wonder why these are important. Do you think it would be appropriate to merge them into the main articles of their manufacturers? It's possible someone may come along and decide to try to delete them, since they're so short. Friday (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Re: Sun-Pat
Firstly, I tweaked the wording to make the article encyclopedic. I removed information which was arguably irrelevant. More than one stub tag looks messy, so I chose to remove the least directly appropriate one. The article title (at the start, where it says Sun-Pat) needs to be italicised because it is a brand name. The accepted norm is for External links to be pluralised regardless of the number of links. Whether "links" ought to be capitalised is up for some debate.

I do hope this rationalises some of my edits and meets your concerns. Rob Church Talk 20:49, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

amens
hello, this is random task. I understand that we got off on the wrong foot over the mutato muzika article, and would like to apologize. I was a tad bratty I admit, and I do clearly need to work on the mechanics of english, but you are clearly a reasonable and intelligent man, and I think we could do very well together.

-spencer

Diva cleanup?
Hi there. I noticed you placed a cleanup tag on Diva. I would like to help, but it is unclear to me what needs cleaning up. Could you tell me? Mareklug talk  22:40, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I did the Diva and Diva (disambiguation) clean up along the lines you suggested on my talk page. Mareklug  talk  23:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Dawn Fellowship
Hi Daniel,

I was rather annoyed that you went & deleted the 'Dawn fellowship' page as 'spam', which I had just started work on (that night!!!). Please note that the 'Christadelphians' page in the discussion section an editor says that the different fellowships should start their own wiki page if they want to have more info on their history/beliefs. I had just emailed a friend for their suggestion on what to put for our history/beliefs & was going to get back to it today, but found your insulting comment about 'spam'. We have now started a new page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawn_Christadelphians, and I hope you won't go & delete that too, and please don't go calling my religious beliefs 'spam' again.

Jean jean@amyloidosisaustralia.org

Unsigned comment from User:147.10.55.50


 * I'll put my response on here page as well, in case your IP changes, and you can't view your talk page.


 * I did not (and can not) delete your page. Special:Undelete/Dawn Fellowship shows that:


 * 10:46, 12 October 2005 AllyUnion deleted "Dawn Fellowship" (spam)


 * In future, please ensure you are accurate in your accusations. --Daniel Lawrence 08:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: DragonBooster Article
Hello. My name is Sean. I saw that you edited some stuff on my DragonBooster article such as some "vandalism" thing. I just want to know what that is you edited because I worked really hard on the article at first and I want it to be 100% accurate. Other people did work on it too and that was nice of them.


 * Unsigned comment from User:204.38.191.99


 * In case your IP changes, and you can't find/view your talk page, you can find my response here: User talk:204.38.191.99. --Daniel Lawrence 15:46, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Re: DragonBooster Article 2
Hello again. I recieved your response. i don't mind that you edited stuff on the article but I consider it to be "mine" because I was the first one to improve upon it and give it the stuff it needed. I would appriciate a bit of help here. someone called 3rkat as been editing my article since last month or way farther back (I heven't been on very much...) and i would just like to know what sort of vandalism occured on "my" article because it said that you reverted vandalism. I'm sorry if i was being inconsiderate and I apologize with all my heart.

Re: Dragon Booster Article:Mystery IP...
Hey. I went over the response you showed me and saw what you wrote about another IP vandalizing the article. I thank you for telling me. I am not responsible for the vandalizim. I don't know and I don't know how my article could have been used for vandilism. I would really like to be friends with you and would like it if you helped me investigate this a bit. I want to have lots of fun on Wikipedia!!

cleaning up after vcxlor
Thankyou. I am not sure whether trawling random pages and slapping things on them is such a good idea after all.vcxlor 23:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Stub sorting
Sorry about that – I misinterpreted 187 Lockdown's "garage act" as "garage band" which performs "garage rock", and hence the UK-rock-band-stub. --Bruce1ee 09:54, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Kilby/Kirby
Well spotted. As you may notice from my contribs list I am on a bit of a place disambiguation frenzy at the moment ;) Morwen - Talk 13:36, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Dragon Booster
Please didn't change the new article of the Dragon this page have 47 kilobytes This may be longer and the compuers slowly and For most long pages division into sections is natural 200.119.53.233 21:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Sigmund Article
Sorry I didnt see there was a good article, plus there was a bunch of discussion on the subject, so i didnt want to revert without input from someone else. I figured the npov tag was a good step towards a real bio and not a slanderous article. I have reverted the article to your previous edit. As well I have asked the members of nola.us (the offshoot forum of mgno.com) to contribute to the article. Onthost 00:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Mike Batt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mike Batt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 14:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:SPAR logo.jpg has been listed for deletion
Just thought I'd let you know I've listed this image for deletion. The reason is I converted it into this vector. - Red  Hot  16:24, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Steve Henifin listed for deletion
An article that you have been involved in editing, Steve Henifin, has been listed at Articles for deletion/Steve Henifin. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Adambiswanger1 01:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Europages
Yes, I've deleted several articles, and I was too fast, this explanation was my fault, sorry for that. The original reason was: "it is an article about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)". Thank you for your appreciation! NCurse work 20:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Guilty removal
That's fine. As you can see I have already replaced it at the main Streisand article with a free image.

I will remove the tagging now. Daniel Case 18:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Eurythmics.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eurythmics.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 09:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Your article and an invitation.
Hello, Daniel. I recently saw your article Speciality Publications, which was very short and unreferenced. I was pondering an AfD but decided against it, however I would be grateful if you could take the time to add more information and references both to this article and any future ones you may create.

Additionally, if you are interested in LGBI issues, I would like to invite you to join WikiProject LGBT studies. We would be delighted to have you. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The Poker Channel logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Poker Channel logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Ingo Nugel.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Ingo Nugel.jpg and also as Image:Ingo Nugen.jpg. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Life_Thru_a_Lens.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Life_Thru_a_Lens.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bambee.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bambee.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 23:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dragon booster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dragon booster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Community Channel logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Community Channel logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Community Channel logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Community Channel logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Direct Debit logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Direct Debit logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Direct Debit logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Direct Debit logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Discovery Real Time logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Discovery Real Time logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Discovery Real Time logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Discovery Real Time logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:187.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:187.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NGfL logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:NGfL logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:New CDUK logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:New CDUK logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Elvaston Castle
I received an email from Freinds of Elvaston which explained the situation to me. The Elvaston Castle Estate Trust was dissolved at one of its meetings, and Friends of Elvaston have the minutes to verify this claim. I have written a reply asking them to provide these minutes. The ECET website is out of date and is not a link that is entirely needed, not to mention potentially damaging to actual Elvaston Estate societies. With your permission, I will remove the link for the time being. If the minutes are not provided I will restore the link. Feel free to discuss this wherever you choose, here, my talk page, the article talk page. Philip  Gronowski  Contribs  00:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, the ECET website is needed. It contains a lot of information about Elvaston Castle and its history.  Whether or not the group that made it still exist, the website is a valuable source of information.
 * Furthermore, if one was to include the information featured on the website in the article, then the website would have to be listed as a source.
 * What I find suspicious is how strongly the FoE want the other website removed from the article. It would make a lot more sense to write just a short section in the article about what people have done, and are doing to help save Elvaston Castle.  This can include the history of the ECET, how it ceased to be, and how the FoE came about.  Of course, I would worry if it were left to the FoE to write this, it would not be neutral (as per Wikipedia's guidelines), as they clearly have some sort of issue with the ECET.
 * In short, the website should stay, regardless of the FoE's reasons. --Daniel Lawrence 14:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I dunno, I understand why they would want the link removed. They certainly wouldn't want people contributing to a group which does not exist anymore while a current one is available. This link seems to show that ECET did dissolve and that FOE is a splinter group. Would putting a small warning after the link be to your liking? Something like this:


 * Friends Of Elvaston Castle Website -Group currently working to preserve the castle.
 * Elvaston Castle Estate Trust Website -Group is currently defunct and information may be out of date.


 * It lets readers know that the website is out of date, but still has enough info to stay on Wikipedia. Philip   Gronowski  Contribs  15:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * How can the history of Elvaston Castle be "out of date"? The website is a fantastic source of information about the castle and estate.  As I said previously, there should be a small section in the article detailing how people have reacted to the plans to sell the estate.  This could include history of the ECET and FoE, and that would be perfectly fine as long as it is neutral.  Then there would be no need for comments after the external links.
 * Also, regarding the link you gave me, did you happen to notice this sentence: "They had been invited to the final meeting in order to resolve some internal matters that had arisen due to their parting of the ways". I said before that it was suspicious why FoE would so strongly want that website removing, and now we have a reason.  Personal disputes.  What are you betting if I wrote that into the article it would be constantly removed, just like the external link?
 * If someone doesn't want something mentioned or linked to on an article, then it's tough. If it is relevant and true, then it goes on.  That's how Wikipedia works - things don't get removed just because someone doesn't want it there.  There is clearly a great deal behind FoE's passion to destory any mention of the ECET, and they are using Wikipedia as a battleground.  --Daniel Lawrence 16:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I completely forgot about this until a recent e-mail. Ok, information regarding what is going to happen to the castle may be out of date, so my previous suggestion still stands. They may not want the website to be thought of as an official website, which is what my text after the links clarifies. I'll change around the sentence a bit as well, so that "information regarding the current Estate may be out of date". I believe it to be a fair compromise, as I said earlier, it allows readers to know that the group is defunct, yet still has information regarding the history of the estate.   Satu  rday  Contribs 17:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Barthezz.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Barthezz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bjørn Lynne.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bjørn Lynne.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cduk logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Cduk logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Community Channel logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Community Channel logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Discovery Real Time logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Discovery Real Time logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Direct Debit logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Direct Debit logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Electribal Memories.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Electribal Memories.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:HTA School of Culinary Art logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HTA School of Culinary Art logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:JobCentre Plus logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:JobCentre Plus logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ideal World logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ideal World logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:R-Kioski logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:R-Kioski logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Teachers' TV logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Teachers' TV logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Peter McConnell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peter McConnell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Peace & Harmony.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peace & Harmony.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Baby Channel logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Baby Channel logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon World.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon World.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon The Movie 2000.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon The Movie 2000.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon The Movie 2000 Original Motion Picture Score (Italian).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon The Movie 2000 Original Motion Picture Score (Italian).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon The First Movie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon The First Movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon The First Movie Original Motion Picture Score.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon The First Movie Original Motion Picture Score.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon Christmas Bash.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon Christmas Bash.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon 3- The Ultimate Soundtrack.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon 3- The Ultimate Soundtrack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pokémon 2BA Master.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon 2BA Master.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:SMTV Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SMTV Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ScrewAttack screenshot.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:ScrewAttack screenshot.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:U-MYX logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:U-MYX logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:SubTV logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SubTV logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Visa Electron logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Visa Electron logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:University of Derby logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:University of Derby logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:World Love.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:World Love.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image Image:(Windows Server 2008 box shot.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Windows Server 2008 box shot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:University of Derby logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:University of Derby logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Totally Pokémon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Totally Pokémon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Treasures TV logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Treasures TV logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Traveller's Tales logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Traveller's Tales logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Teachers'_TV_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:Teachers'_TV_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Bleh999 03:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Garry_Schyman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Garry_Schyman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Geoff_Taylor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Geoff_Taylor.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 22:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:David Gray.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:David Gray.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 17:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Parents for Inclusion
Hi. I came across this article you started and saw it lacks anything to establish notability so I tagged it. Can you come up with any media references to meet the notability guidelines? Thanks, -- A. B. (talk) 01:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dancing Stage EuroMIX cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Dancing Stage EuroMIX cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 19:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Jamie_Lidell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamie_Lidell.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Garry Schyman
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Garry Schyman, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Garry Schyman is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Garry Schyman, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 05:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Randy Newman.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Randy Newman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Zoom_Zoom.jpg
I have tagged Image:Zoom_Zoom.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 21:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Windows_Server_2008_box_shot.jpg
I have tagged Image:Windows_Server_2008_box_shot.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast 19:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ingo Nugel.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ingo Nugel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 08:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:R-Kioski_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:R-Kioski_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you.  PxMa 22:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:U-MYX logo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:U-MYX logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 15:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:U-MYX Pet Shop Boys.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:U-MYX Pet Shop Boys.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 15:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Rosemary Sage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rosemary Sage.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 05:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Beautiful Corrs.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Beautiful Corrs.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac 18:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Beautiful Corrs.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Beautiful Corrs.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jame§ugrono 12:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:SMTV_Logo.gif
I have tagged Image:SMTV_Logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:187.jpg
I have tagged Image:187.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ideal_World_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:Ideal_World_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Discovery_Real_Time_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:Discovery_Real_Time_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:JobCentre_Plus_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:JobCentre_Plus_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:SubTV_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:SubTV_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Peter_McConnell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Peter_McConnell.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Snettisham_sign.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Snettisham_sign.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vera_the_Cuckoo.jpg
I have tagged Image:Vera_the_Cuckoo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:The_Baby_Channel_logo.jpg
I have tagged Image:The_Baby_Channel_logo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Direct_Debit_logo.gif
I have tagged Image:Direct_Debit_logo.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Lisa_Lougheed.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lisa_Lougheed.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:World_Love.jpg
I have tagged Image:World_Love.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:International_Velvet.jpg
I have tagged Image:International_Velvet.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Equally_Cursed_and_Blessed.jpg
I have tagged Image:Equally_Cursed_and_Blessed.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Way_Beyond_Blue.jpg
I have tagged Image:Way_Beyond_Blue.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Greg_Howe_cover.jpg
I have tagged Image:Greg_Howe_cover.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:ComParrot_Spot_the_difference.gif
I have tagged Image:ComParrot_Spot_the_difference.gif as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Solent_TV_logo.JPG
I have tagged Image:Solent_TV_logo.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Alligator_cover.jpg
I have tagged Image:Alligator_cover.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hello_Waveforms.jpg
I have tagged Image:Hello_Waveforms.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Strange_Cargo_II.jpg
I have tagged Image:Strange_Cargo_II.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Strange_Cargo_Hinterland.jpg
I have tagged Image:Strange_Cargo_Hinterland.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pieces_in_a_Modern_Style.jpg
I have tagged Image:Pieces_in_a_Modern_Style.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Guilty_Pleasures.jpg
I have tagged Image:Guilty_Pleasures.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Sunblock_dancers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sunblock_dancers.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Goes_Petshopping_cover.jpg
I have tagged Image:Goes_Petshopping_cover.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Specialty_Publications_logo.jpg
I have tagged Image:Specialty_Publications_logo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:ScrewAttack_logo.jpg
I have tagged Image:ScrewAttack_logo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Electribal_Memories.jpg
I have tagged Image:Electribal_Memories.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pokémart
Pokémart, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Pokémart satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Pokémart and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Pokémart during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 04:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Rawhead Rexx
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Rawhead Rexx, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pokémon World.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokémon World.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Community Channel logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Community Channel logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Community Channel logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Community Channel logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Greg Howe cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Greg Howe cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Pokémon soundtracks
I have nominated pokémon soundtracks for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Wild (band)
I have nominated Wild (band), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Wild (band)&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:13, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jake Kaufman
I have nominated Jake Kaufman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jake Kaufman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Óðinn ☭☆ talk 01:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Daniel Lawrence! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jaakko Laajava -
 * 2) Ichiro Shimakura -
 * 3) Ian Macfadyen -
 * 4) Atsushi Shirakawa -
 * 5) Shinji Miyazaki -
 * 6) Junichi Masuda -
 * 7) Guy Moon -
 * 8) Cevin Fisher -


 * Shinji Miyazaki is unreferenced no longer! かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 19:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pikku Orava


The article Pikku Orava has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unable to find evidence for notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ucucha 23:50, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miyoko Kobayashi


The article Miyoko Kobayashi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jun Ishikawa (composer)


The article Jun Ishikawa (composer) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 21:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ichiro Shimakura


The article Ichiro Shimakura has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aya Tanaka


The article Aya Tanaka has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Atsushi Shirakawa


The article Atsushi Shirakawa has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No interviews or biographies available to expand/source the article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Prince (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guy Moon


The article Guy Moon has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No notability, no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:15, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon 3- The Ultimate Soundtrack.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon 3- The Ultimate Soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Matthew Kirk, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Pokémon The Movie 2000 Original Motion Picture Score (Italian).jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pokémon The Movie 2000 Original Motion Picture Score (Italian).jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Hilda Plowright for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilda Plowright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hilda Plowright until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pokémon The First Movie.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pokémon The First Movie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 00:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rawhead Rexx


The article Rawhead Rexx has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Although this could simply be moved to Helloween's article, there's not much to suggest it because my searches found nothing at all and it seems there's no considerably noticeable connection between the two and that's not surprising as it seems this particular band was not largely active and otherwise widely known.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  06:22, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tomohiro Harada


The article Tomohiro Harada has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP (article age doesn't qualify for a BLP PROD), and looks to fail WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 14:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Yum Chums listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yum Chums. Since you had some involvement with the Yum Chums redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Server 2008 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Server 2008. Since you had some involvement with the Server 2008 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dean Honer


The article Dean Honer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced since 2009! Non notable music producer who does not meet GNG or subject specific guidelines"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Club Oranje T 11:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of ScrewAttack for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ScrewAttack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ScrewAttack& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Podoboo listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Podoboo. Since you had some involvement with the Podoboo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon Christmas Bash.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Christmas Bash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Masanori Hikichi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masanori Hikichi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Masanori Hikichi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A loose noose (talk) 06:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jim Hedges (composer)


The article Jim Hedges (composer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Govvy (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Hess for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Hess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dan Hess until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 23:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Hedges (composer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Hedges (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Hedges (composer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 12:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Rosemary Sage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemary Sage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rosemary Sage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Daniel Lawrence

Thank you for creating Evergreen Nights.

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Paxo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paxo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paxo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Matthew Kirk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Kirk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matthew Kirk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Uhooep (talk) 14:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Specialty Publications for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Specialty Publications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Specialty Publications until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)