User talk:Daniel Sansano

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Sansano


A tag has been placed on Daniel Sansano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hatchens (talk) 07:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Sansano


A tag has been placed on Daniel Sansano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Northern Escapee (talk) 07:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Daniel Sansano, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.   Hatchens (talk) 07:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Blablubbs | talk 13:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. Paul ❬talk❭ 13:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Sansano
Hello Daniel Sansano,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Sansano for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Sansano


A tag has been placed on Daniel Sansano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Blablubbs | talk 11:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Sansano for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Sansano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Sansano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blablubbs | talk 11:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You appear to have used as a second account. EdJohnston (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Sansano


A tag has been placed on Daniel Sansano, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone 18:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. Your recent edit(s) to the page Legislative district of Nueva Vizcaya appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. Your recent edit(s) to the page Legislative district of Nueva Vizcaya appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This official list of Philippine legislators (page 76) shows an "Antonio G. Escamilla" as the deputy from Nueva Vizcaya in the 7th Philippine Legislature. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh ok my apologies Daniel Sansano (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 7th Philippine Legislature. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok sure Daniel Sansano (talk) 16:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to 1935 Philippine presidential election have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm JohnFromPinckney. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of political families in the Philippines, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''I hope the tutorial linked here is useful to you. The links WP:CITETYPE and WP:INCITE might help you, too. And by the way, Wikipedia pages don't ever constitute usable reliable sources; you will have to look "outside" for those. Thanks, and happy editing &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk)'' 20:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Daniel, it's me again. There's another possible issue, that I'd like to make sure you know about: Wikipedia's guideline on Conflict of interest (COI) editing. Since your user name is Sansano and you are trying to add information about the Sansano clan at List of political families in the Philippines, it looks as though you may have a conflict. Please have a read through the COI page, especially the part about writing about yourself, family, friends. If you think you might fall into the COI category, consider taking the steps at WP:DISCLOSE. Regards, &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:03, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


 * excuse me, I actually did put sources in furthur reading and that family is legitimetly a dynasty. I would appreciate it if you put them back thank you Daniel Sansano (talk) 00:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Daniel, thanks for your answer. I realize you're still kind of new here and that it's hard to learn all the ins and outs of the place. I hope I can clear a few things up.
 * If you are talking about the three lines
 * http://www.pangasinan.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/242–2013.pdf
 * https://ph.rappler.com/people/ramon-sansano
 * Legislative districts of Pangasinan
 * then I'm afraid they don't serve our puposes. You originally had them under References (I hadn't seen them earlier) but then you moved them to Further reading. One problem with that is that, if they are supposed to be reference citations for some textual claims, they don't belong in Further reading (see Further reading for more about that section). The second problem is that there is no connection between the individual claims (like that Hugo Sansano Sr. was a Congressman in 1913, or that Poblacion Sansano was Barangay Captain) and the sources you are using. That's one reason I didn't notice the three lines down in the References section originally. The thing to do is create inline citations; that's the WP:INCITE link I gave you earlier, to a section titled Inline citations. I recommend you (especially) read the part at WP:CITEFOOT, which explains How to place an inline citation using ref tags.
 * But now for the bad news. Those three links, even when they're used in the right way, don't help us any. The point is to provide Verifiability for the claims we make, but those targets don't provide that. Here's why:
 * is no longer available. I get an HTTP 404 error. I see that https://www.pangasinan.gov.ph/ is still serving, but that PDF is no longer at that URI. What often happens is that websites (especially government websites) get reworked, and nobody thinks it important to preserve or migrate the old resources to the new site. But maybe you can snoop around there and still find that PDF file or its equivalent. But: if you do find such a PDF, we would want to know what page numbers you find what facts on (and of course, the document title, author, etc.).
 * is active, but has only 10 words to say about Ramon, nothing very informative.
 * is a link to a Wikipedia page, which isn't any good, because we can't be a reference for ourselves. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source! So we can't use that link either (unless you find usable references at that page).
 * I'm sorry if it seems that I'm trying to obstruct you or something. I'm not! I hope you will be able to find some usable sources so we can get at least some of the Sansano info included. It takes some work, though, and I hope you will accept the guidance you get from me and other, more experienced editors.
 * And one last little item (for now): It looks like almost all of your edits have been marked as "minor" (that's the little, bold m you see in your contributions page). Adding significant quantities of content is not a minor edit. Minor edits are spelling corrections or formatting fixes. See Help:Minor edit for more details.
 * Good luck, &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 02:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)