User talk:Daniel kenneth/Archive 1

Your AfD nominations
Hello Daniel kenneth. You only started editing this Wikipedia two days ago and from the three Articles for Deletion discussions you have already started, you do not appear experienced enough to do this. First, you need to make yourself thoroughly familiar with all the various notability criteria on English Wikipedia. Start at WP:GNG which has links to the criteria for most subjects here. Secondly, an article being short and needing improvement is never grounds for deletion on its own. Please also read the guidance at WP:BEFORE and stop nominating any more articles for deletion until you have a better grasp of the principles behind the deletion process. Voceditenore (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * has said everything I wanted to say .... You need to provide much better reasons for deletion, Continuing down this path will end up you being indef blocked so it's probably a wise choice to pack the AFD nominating for now ... Just focus on article editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your tagging
Seconding what Davey and Voceditenore said. You're also indiscriminately placing notability tags on articles with no proper reasoning ("‎This article may not be notable enough"), no reason such as with the article of the language Garus language or that of charting songs such as Centipede (song) In other instances you're placing unreferenced tags on articles that clearly have references, like what you did in the Blaster (Star Wars) article.

Please disclose if you're a sock puppet for another account.--Oakshade (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Daniel kenneth, I was also going to mention this. I am gradually going through the large number of articles that you were tagging at the rate of 1 per minute yesterday, and I suspect others are as well. Almost all of them were either wrongly placed or unnecessary or for problems that you could have fixed. Do not mark an article as of questionable notability just because you haven't heard of it. Familiarise yourself thoroughly with the relevant notability guidelines for that subject area and do a search to see if sources exist for the subject of the article before you tag. If you then still think the tag is justified, always follow up the tag with a discussion on the article's talk page justifying your addition. If an article is already tagged for needing better references, do not add an extra one which is blindingly obvious and redundant, e.g. as you did here. Please read Tag bombing and the guidance at the top of Template messages/Cleanup. Tag bombing articles is a purely "negative" contribution to Wikipedia. We're here to add to the sum of the world's knowledge, not plaster existing articles with badges of shame and then fly on to the next article to tag with a badge of shame. Try to make your future contributions positive ones. If you find an article that needs better referencing, look for references and add them. Observe:  vs . It took me only 5 minutes to find and add those sources. Voceditenore (talk) 10:15, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Voceditenore and others are spot on here. One of the most irritating things on wikipedia is when people go about article plastering tags on them and doing nothing to improve them. We've got thousands of articles on here with various tags on them for a good ten years now, proof that few people are really doing anything. And in the meantime it makes the articles look even more pitiful and ugly. We know that we're grossly underachieving as an encyclopedia in terms of quality and badly need editors to improve our poorly researched articles, but placing tags on them makes it even worse in my opinion. Even if you add one sourced line it would make far more of a difference than adding a tag. This tool will allow you to draw up citations from google books to save time. Before opening an AFD or tagging try looking in google books, find a sourced fact and move on.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Finding references using ProveIt
Hi there. I've recently undone a couple of your edits that you made using ProveIt. In both cases the sources you gave seemed to have been created from Wikipedia. Please check when you find sources that the text is an original work (not derived from Wikipedia) and meets the requirements of Identifying reliable sources. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions. You can reply here or on my talk page. Robevans123 (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey there, user ThunderSkunk here. I'm also seconding Robevans123 observation. The source you cited for a claim on Acyl halide was a copy and paste job of the same article (but an older version before I added the citation needed tag). From what I've seen, the User:ProveIt GT script isn't ready to replace human intuition concerning sources.ThunderSkunk (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Don't tamper with others' posts
I hate to pile on, but what is the point of edits like this?  E Eng  18:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:Collapse, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   12:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Esquivalience  t 01:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

MFD
That's enough. You've had more than enough fun at MFD. Stop it right now or I'm blocking you without a second thought. The humor ran out when you started listing other people's pages for deletion. I don't care if they are decade-old blocked user, it's still not funny. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * - You might wanna block this tool as he's still carrying it on. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Is it still going on? Time stamp showed that the last edit was two minutes before my post. Other people are taking it up but that's another issue. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It looks like he's stopped. I've spent the last 5 minutes reverting and deleting and cleaning up. Hopefully his parents will eventually teach him the difference between "funny" and "pointlessly annoying". --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked for the remainder of the day. If this resumes tomorrow - indeed, if you resume ANY of the disruptive editing patterns you've been showing since starting here - you'll be blocked indefinitely.  This is not a playground. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 hours for not stopping the disruption (not fun... disruption) when told to by multiple people. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 14:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Anthony Rodriguez (pianist)
Hope you guys are well. Anthony Rodriguez won a 2005 Bronze Telly Award on a BET Film "Tangys Song" Anthony was the producer for the theme song and also played the piano, that's a Major Award. IMDb - Also, Anthony Rodriguez just like many notable musicians around the world release records and album independently with distribution deals. Not all successful musicians are signed to a record label. He's a Music entrepreneur. I ask of you to please reconsider the nomination of deletion. If anything can perhaps be changed, please let me know. I believe in this Article. Thank you! StrongWik (talk) 17:15, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your signature
Hi, your signature is in violation of our guideline on custom signatures. Specifically, it is too long in the wiki markup when expanded out from the checkuser template, taking up about half of the editing window. As template transclusions are also not allowed in signatures, please stop using {{subst:checkuser}} as a signature. Thanks, ansh 666 22:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

RfA, AfD
Hi. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A review of your edits reveals that you probably do not have sufficient experience to be doing maintenance tasks. Please also read WP:RFAV. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

AfD participation
Hi Daniel. Welcome to Wikipedia. You are a relatively new account and have been participating in AfD discussions. It would be better if you familiarize yourself with WP:GNG and get some more experience before getting involved in this area. I would like a reply to this comment because I am not sure if you see the comments on your talkpage. Kingsindian &#9821; &#9818; 20:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * He sees them -- he fixed his signature per the comment a few threads up.  E Eng  20:23, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Daniel Kenneth, I've just reviewed your contributions history, and urge you to take to heart the comments from others here. You will learn fasted how Wikipedia works by contributing to articles, not attempting to participate in project discussions such as AfD, where for now your comments appear to be simply parroting what other editors have said, which doesn't help at all. Please find an article on a subject that interests you, and improve it by adding content or improving referencing.  E Eng  20:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Don't take it hard Daniel, but it is hard to know all the policies and actually be helpful in maintenance related areas until you have a pretty good amount of experience doing genuine article work. For me, that is often going in and cleaning up existing prose, finding sources for potentially controversial facts, or updating them. I also write fresh prose from time to time, but all of it is important. Participating in AFDs simply for the sake of participating, however, isn't helpful, even if you don't mean any harm. My suggestion is to work on improving some articles a bit. Not just tagging them, but actually adding or fixing. As an example: When I'm feeling lazy, I use the "random article" feature on the left side of the page. Odds are, within 5 or 10 clicks, I will find something I can improve a little. Just an idea. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 22:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

GamerGate Sanctions Notice

 * Cheers!
 * You should also know that, when your 502'd edit is to that article, and the previous most hundred or so were semi-automated welcome edits, you should probably avoid Gamergate or any topics associated with it, videogames, feminism, or gender. I say this because your 502'd edit appears to simply be to introduce a spelling error, and thus I'd warrant that you're not very familiar with Wikipedia or its systems.  Inexperienced editors who rush right into a highly toxic area like Gamergate are often quickly sanctioned, topic banned, or outright blocked.  Further, since so many of your edits were mechanical in nature, very few people will be willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on this.--Jorm (talk) 06:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Code 8 (2017 film)
While all are in agreement that an article on the projected 2017 film is premature, there is the general consensus that an article on the current short could be notable enough... that understood, the article has been edited and re-titled to be ABOUT the 2016 film. And since the corrected article is no longer about an unmade film, my own stance is that with these changes the article can now be kept as Code 8 and the projected 2017 film as a topic can be dealt with if and or when it happens. Pretty much for now we need only deal with a film which exists and is sourcable... and even the original nominator supports this view. Care to revisit the discussion? Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 16:00, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your user talk page
Hey, Daniel kenneth, Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project which involves interacting with other editors even, or even especially, when they have comments or criticism of you edits. This happens to all of us, no matter what our level of experience. I see that you are archiving your talk page messages quickly without even acknowledging the comments from some very experienced editors and admins who are giving you their advice and trying to gently inform you that some of your editing behavior could get you into trouble. By ignoring them, it gives the impression that you don't care and they are less likely to cut you some slack when you make a serious mistake (and we ALL make editing mistakes!). Wikipedia is not a popularity contest but editing here on a regular basis requires all editors to communicate with each other. I think you would help yourself and your reputation if you at least responded to editors who post here and keep your messages on your page for at least a month before hiding them away in an archive. Basically, all of your user talk page edits shouldn't be Welcome messages or Warnings for vandalism, we try to get along with each other as that is what benefits the project here the most and that often requires discussion. Have any questions about all this? The folks at the Teahouse are happy to answer any of your questions about editing and life on this crazy project we call Wikipedia. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=717518361 your edit] to Dorchester, Boston may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * * The http://www.library.neu.edu/archives/collect/findaids/m55find.htm [[La Alianza Hispana] records,

Penguins
Hi Daniel: I see you tried to find a source for a questioned bit of info in the penguin article. That's great (and thanks for trying to find one), but the source you linked to is actually a Wikipedia mirror, so in effect, we're naming ourselves as the source — which is (of course) unacceptable. We need to try to find an independent source that provides this information. I've undone your addition of the source, and will keep looking... Let me know if you have any questions. MeegsC (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Gantt chart page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=717541857 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F717541857%7CGantt chart%5D%5D Ask for help])
 * On the List of costliest Atlantic hurricanes page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=717542314 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F717542314%7CList of costliest Atlantic hurricanes%5D%5D Ask for help])

Article structure style
Please do not do this (inserting spaces in headers, converting ===October=== to === October ===. It is unnecessary and affects the search facility when editing. Searching for ==o does not work when a space has been inserted. You wouldn't change an article form Am.Eng to Br.Eng so why change an editorial structure style? Mjroots (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * that edit was made with the AutoEd script; you might want to take up the issue with the people who maintain that. (Specifically, it seems AutoEd/whitespace.js is the culprit here.) ansh 666 14:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your proposal to delete the page on Beohar Rammanohar Sinha
Please don't propose deletion of the page on Beohar Rammanohar Sinha. Its not about any living person (he died in 2007).

Beohar Rammanohar Sinha was one of the most important artists (painters) of India who is credited with beautifying the Constitution of India to make it one of the most illuminated-ornamented constitution of the world. He also used his art towards inter-civilization dialog for world harmony.

I do plan to expand the page. At that point of time, I will certainly add references that I am collecting at present. It will be much appreciated if you withdraw the deletion.

Thanks and regards,

Abrsinha (talk) 14:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Yaseeda Maya tagged for deletion due to lack of references
Hello, just like title says, I got curious about wikipedia and its rules. So, in a nutshell, you guys expecting person to provide some "serious" proof about identity and life of a person, described in article. However, realisticly, only few people are globaly known and have their background covered in "serious" literatur/sources.

Does it mean that those of us who are only known within small soiceties/groups have no way of confirming even the fact of our existence just because there no official sources describing them? Especialy since wiki doesnt see any social network references as "legit sources" (but in reality, lot of pretty interesting and known activists nowadays become known mainly thanks to social networks!).

I would like to clarify this because there quite a lot of articles/biographies about barely known outside of their societies/groups yet they managed to make it to Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaseeda (talk • contribs) 08:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Super Pang
hi, I see that you have removed my request for deletion from the Super Pang redirect page so that Super Buster Bros. could be moved there. The game was developed by Mitchell Corporation, who gave it the name Super Pang so this should surely be the name of the article rather than the name given by a licensor for a single territory? Wikipedia naming guidelines suggest that the most common English name should be used, and the rest of the world is bigger than North America. MrMajors (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Goa Lokayukta
Goa Lokayukta is a position in the Indian state of Goa, held by a living person. I have added a very relevant and notable inline citation from the Hindu Times. The article needs expansion, but deletion is not and never was needed. Cheers!--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Stub tags
Please take care not to add stub to an article like Vangelis Pavlidis which already has a specific stub tag. It just wastes other editors' time. Thanks. Pam D  18:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Csd
You should probably familiarize yourself more thoroughly with CSD criteria. A1 is when you cannot tell what the article is supposed to be about. A7 only applies to the specific things listed. It does not apply to geographic articles, either physical or social. This is in reference to Farm to Market Road 2551. John from Idegon (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

UPSat references
You added a "needs more references" tag in UPSat just added a few. Do you think it's ok? --Phroxen (talk) 02:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

bierenvanbegeerte
Hi Daniel, tx for your message. Can I talk to you on here like this? Koen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koenfier (talk • contribs) 19:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kiliaen Van Rensselaer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearst. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Kiliaen Van Rensselaer redirect
Hello. As someone involved in recent changes to Kiliaen Van Rensselaer you may be interesting in a proposal I've made on the article talk page regarding reverting to the redirect that had been in place since 2005. Thanks for your attention. Gab4gab (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

x
LEAVE MY EDITS ALONE I ATTEND COLBERT HEIGHTS AND ALL I SAY IS THE TRUTH

Reference errors on 22 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Wembley Stadium (1923) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721527130 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F721527130%7CWembley Stadium (1923)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Reference errors on 24 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * On the John Connolly (author) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721838935 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F721838935%7CJohn Connolly (author)%5D%5D Ask for help])

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=722374428 your edit] to Economy of Pakistan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of R&B musicians
 * added links pointing to All Saints, Allure, Ashanti and ATL

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 17:01:26, 30 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Fmhorner
Hmmm, I am very rusty with wiki pages and html, but I will try to use the pages correctly. My first attempt at an article on American Carry-Products Company (AMCO) was rejected as not notable enough. I did read the WP page about notability. I have gathered several more references, but they are mentions of products in various interest groups and in old magazines. Mostly referencing company products themselves which is kind of self promoting even though the company does not exist any more. My main interest in having an article about American Carry-Products Company is that it is a well known name (as AMCO) in the vintage car world and yet there is very little information out there today to identify AMCO from all the other companies that use the same acronym. When I do any search on AMCO, I only get some California business name info and references to vintage advertisements as well as some reproduction products and vintage products that are still floating around for sale. There does not seem to be any information out there about the company itself except what they have published themselves. As a company that was in business for almost 60 years producing products for the sports car world, I there needs to be some reference somewhere about the name of the company and the AMCO brand since it has been very diluted or overused by many other companies. Please give me some advice.

Here are some additional references which I can add to the page, but I don't know if it will help: http://www.mgexp.com/phorum/read.php?71,2295563 http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/333378-post26.html http://classicjaguar.com/cj/1965CD.html http://mgaguru.com/mgtech/accessories/at102d.htm

Regards, Fred Horner

Fmhorner (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

I would like to thank you for the research that you have done. I will now give my opinions on the references that you proposed to add:


 * http://www.mgexp.com/phorum/read.php?71,2295563


 * I would strongly advice you not to use that link as a reference since it is using a forum post as a reference.


 * http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/333378-post26.html
 * I would strongly advice you not to use that link as a reference since it uses a forum as a reference. A forum post is not considered a reliable source.


 * http://classicjaguar.com/cj/1965CD.html
 * I would consider this as a source but I think you will only be able to get a few reliable data or no reliable data from it since it does seem promotional.


 * http://mgaguru.com/mgtech/accessories/at102d.htm
 * I am uncertain on adding this one as a source since what you only get here that could be usable is the existence of a product sold by AMCO and its specifications.

I am uncertain if you will be able to prove to the other editors that it is notable enough to warrant inclusion to Wikipedia.

Daniel kenneth (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 02:48:53, 1 June 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Bernardwerner
Referring to Draft: Oswald Werner As if often the case, even the most detailed instructions can be subject to interpretation. I was being told previously that I didn't have enough substantive references which resulted in the article you rejected. If I look at similar articles for living people, I see very little in the way of references. Some guidance would be appreciated.

I am referring to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_M._Adovasio

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_E._Buikstra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Struever

Bernardwerner (talk) 02:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Help with Wiki Page Editting
Talk: OriGene Technologies

Hi Daniel,

I received your message on offering help on editing my page content. If you are willing to provide suggestion or help, that would be great.

I re-submitted, but this time it was declined because of "notability". I looked at a lot of other company pages. They don't have a lot of external sources either. "Notability" is a vague concept. Not sure how to improve.

Help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahuang8 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

18:03:32, 7 June 2016 review of submission by SueJenkins
Hello Daniel kenneth. Thank you for your help in pointing out my omissions (references for videography and art market). I have now inserted some. I am hoping that this will be acceptable. Best wishes. SueJ 18:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Beck (painter) has been accepted
 Robert Beck (painter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Daniel kenneth (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Robert_Beck_(painter) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

I believe you have made a mistake
You reverted one of my edits as vandalism and left a message on my talk page arguing it wasn't constructive. Please explain how that is the case, and please undo your action. The DHC-6 is currently marketed as the Viking DHC-6 Twin Otter, but former Twin Otters are not 'also known' as Viking DHC-6 Twin Otters, hence the change. Thank you, WallyWyatt &#91; contact &#93; 14:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

The difference page sometimes looks like vandalism
I reverted your revert here, because in this case, it didn’t seem like vandalism to me.

Maybe you were misled by what I think is a flaw in the way Wikipedia displays “prev” versions from the edit history. Sometimes, an edit looks like it removed a huge chunk of content, then added another chunk of content, when it has really only changed a little something that splits things in a different way. It’s annoying, because if you really want to make sure that’s all it is, you have to compare the chunk Wikipedia displays as removed with the the chunk it displays as added, character by character. I'm not sure if I explained things clearly, so let me know if I should clarify. Willondon (talk) 14:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Why was my edit to the list of fictional bears removed?
How on earth was it not constructive or whatever? It was adding an item missing from a list, and it wasn't just made up because it had its own wikipedia page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:820B:3700:B5E8:3E9C:8EBF:9FA9 (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)