User talk:Daniela001Johnson

Walid Laamarti moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Walid Laamarti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Onel5969,
 * Thank you for your message regarding the draft article on Walid Laamarti. I understand that you have concerns about the article's suitability for publication and its compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines on undisclosed paid editing (UPE) or conflict of interest (COI).
 * I would like to clarify that all the information provided in the article is based on reliable sources and supported by evidence. I have made every effort to ensure that the content is verifiable and meets Wikipedia's standards for notability.
 * I apologize if there was any misunderstanding or confusion regarding the sources and evidence provided. I am open to discussing any specific concerns you may have about the content or references in the article. I am committed to addressing any issues and making the necessary revisions to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines.
 * I appreciate your guidance and expertise in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. I assure you that I am fully committed to upholding these standards and ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the content.
 * Please let me know if there are any specific aspects of the article that you would like me to review or if there are any additional steps I should take to address your concerns. I value your feedback and look forward to working with you to resolve this matter.
 * Thank you for your time and attention. Daniela001Johnson (talk) 12:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You were also asked to address the COI/UPE issue, which you have not done. What is your relationship to Laamarti? Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Walid Laamarti


A tag has been placed on Walid Laamarti, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Daniela001Johnson, if you make a choice to circumvent the AFC process, your contributions will be subject to the scrutiny of other editors as to what should be in "WP:ARTICLESPACE". I remind you of this guideline. --Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Shirley Ann Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Daniela001Johnson, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for email.

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends, relatives or business associates. You also say ''we can make the necessary improvements... granting us some time to manage and enhance the page. This will allow us... Our goal... our request.''. Who is "we"?

Please read the guidance below:


 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * Much of your text is unsourced. The refs that you do give include press releases, interviews with him, and sources that either don't confirm or contradict (Chelsea) what you have said.
 * You can't show notability without real verifiable facts. Being a CEO of a company doesn't make him notable in itself, especially when we don't know if the company is notable.
 * You list a Forbes' article, a news interview and a Morocco World article under "Career", which seems odd...


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * You state, without proper sources, has held a number of important positions... involved enhancing the use of artificial intelligence... he oversaw the business operations of approximately 600 Millions.[what?]  Laamarti is leader who is transforming the global economy in the world...


 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. If you are writing about yourself, or someone you know as a friend, colleague, client, employer or relative, you have a conflict of interest, and you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)