User talk:Danielallenbutler

Thank you! A very useful piece of information. It will definitely be particularly useful next month. Danielallenbutler (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Since you seem to be unable to put the clues together, let me give you a hint. The IP address 108.45.106.43 is not registered to the UK, where Paul lives. It's Verizon FIOS in the eastern US. Man, how net-green can you be.

108.45.106.43 (talk) 01:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Again, we're not Paul, nor have we claimed to be LaGrange. Obscurity. Fame. Not published. You really are on an ego trip, aren't you? Just to peg how small you are, little man, we Googled the news archive. In the midst of all the Titanic movie buzz, when your book was being "tremendously received" or whatever you called it - no interviews. The only news articles are of you sitting pathetically behind some folding table somewhere hoping someone will ask you to sign your book-sized paraphrase of Walter Lord's efforts. How's that fame working for you? With the 100th anniversary coming up, the documentary producers must be burning up your phone getting ahold of you. No? Strange. ..

108.45.106.43 (talk) 01:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Oh, watch me quake in my boots, Paul! So now you're pretending to be Lagrange613? I tremble. Or didn't you know that responses through talk pages appear on both the originators pages as well as the receivers? So I know that Lagrange did not send the previous message. Now buzz off, little man, into the obscurity you so richly deserve. Danielallenbutler (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello again, Dan. The usage of the pronoun "we" implies we are pretending to represent Wikipedia only in your self-important ego space. We are, in fact, two people sitting at the keyboard. She says Hi, by the way. Second, "we" are not Paul Lee, so you can stop libeling him any time now. (By the way, you'd better familiarize yourself with the draconian libel laws in the UK where Paul lives - you might have some legal action coming your way - I forwarded a link to him). We merely used his web page because Wikipedia likes references. Interesting how you whine about the "we" usage, yet completely fail to comment on the cardinal sin you have committed over and over again of editing your own page, then compound the error by admitting it to an editor. In short, your page will be deleted, and your pathetic attempt at using "the internets" to advertise your books has failed. Is your existence so vacuous that you must spend 30 lines claiming more success than Paul Lee? Given that he has a PhD in nuclear physics, and you most certainly don't have credentials that come anywhere near that, I'd say that the phrase "methinks he doth protest too much" is particularly appropriate. Truly sad.

Hello, Dan. Contrary to what you may have read somewhere, Wikipedia is not a free advertising resource. Your bio contains falsehoods and unsubstantiated statements that are inappropriate. In addition, since you are so obviously a noob, we will inform you that you are NOT allowed to edit your own page. 108.45.106.43 (talk) 00:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Danielallenbutler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Daniel Allen Butler, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lagrange613 (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on Daniel Allen Butler. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lagrange613 (talk) 00:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

October 2011
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Daniel Allen Butler. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger One ping only 05:21, 4 October 2011 (UTC)