User talk:Danieldis47

 Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles


 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

, good luck, and have fun.

Paid Editing
Pleas be cautious doing paid editing on Wikipedia, and bear in mind the conflict of interest policy. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Understood, and thank you for the advice. Danieldis47 (talk) 17:41, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Archimedes, Inc. for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Archimedes, Inc., which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Archimedes, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--res Laozi speak  13:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Archimedes logo 220 42.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Archimedes logo 220 42.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from canvassing
'' Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large.--res Laozi speak  03:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. As you can see, my messages are entirely non-partisan and neutral, and they total only four in number. I do not know these editors and I have no idea what their opinions on anything are. They are simply the editors who made some edit(s) to the Archimedes, Inc. page. Danieldis47 (talk) 03:21, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * It is appropriate to notify users who have made substantial edits, like the anon IP. Notifying everyone in the edit history, even if their edit is as minor as a typo correction, is disruptive. I understand your frustration that your article is being nominated for deletion, but please refrain from breaking behaviour guidelines.--res Laozi speak  03:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello again, my shadow! It seems that the only person I have disrupted is you!  So sorry!  Danieldis47 (talk) 03:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please keep this discussion on your talk page or on the AfD discussion, I don't want this to be a race to have the last word on multiple pages. I understand your frustrations, but I hope this discussion will remain civil, and not spread across the talk pages of very minorly involved users. --res Laozi speak  03:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And yet, you do give every appearance of wanting to have all the last words. Curious!  I know you have kept yourself very busy, and that must be frustrating.  Civilly yours, Danieldis47 (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please, let's let the issue go, you had your last words on the AfD, we should move on. Let me emphasise, I understand the frustration of seeing one's own article nominated for deletion. I harbour no ill will towards you, and hopefully we can resolve this issue through calm and rational discourse.--res Laozi speak  04:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

A note
I think we've got off to a bad start. I'd like to apologise and turn over a new leaf with you, because I think this is getting a little too personal. In the interest of being open, have you ever edited on behalf of any organisation or 'for' any organisation, even unpaid? If so, which articles? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 04:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Sadly, apology not accepted. Thanks! Danieldis47 (talk) 04:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's put it another, firmer way: I'm seriously concerned that you're editing on behalf of a person, company or organisation and that you are actively obfuscating that fact to prevent Wikipedia policies and processes from being carried out properly. I am giving you the chance to declare whether or not you have you ever edited on behalf of another person, company or organisation, to 'declare your biases', if you will - as I declare mine on my userpage. Are you willing to declare the third parties you have edited for or on behalf of? Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 04:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * All of my edits are available for any party to scrutinize as they please. I write the best, Wikipedia-guideline-following articles (and edits to other articles) that I can.  I appreciate the input of the Wikipedia community of editors in helping to make sure that those articles are done correctly and well. I appreciate and share your wish to make Wikipedia as bias-free as possible. (PS. I know of no requirement that Wikipedia editors declare their interests...)  Be well!  Danieldis47 (talk) 04:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Danieldis47:
 * It seems to me that your account exists for the sole or primary purpose of promoting persons, companies, products, services, or organizations.
 * Four of your articles are up for deletion because the community thinks they have violated our guidelines for inclusion and our NPOV, SPAM and COI policies. One editor who has been here for five years and amassed 65,000 edits has even put forward the opinion that you are creating walled gardens of non-neutral, non-notable articles. The rest of your articles show a pattern of editing on behalf of your employer.
 * I have made you aware of the Conflict of Interest guideline and you have continued to promote said persons by involving yourself in the deletion discussions and refusing to acknowledge that you have any conflict of interest. This is considered 'disruption'.
 * You have already admitted that this account is linked to your Twitter account, thereby disclosing your name. This has led me to a copy of your résumé which indicates that the majority of your edits were made purely to advance your clients, or on behalf of your employer. I am therefore blocking your account indefinitely, as I do not believe you are here to improve our project - instead, you are here to use it to advance your own agenda. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 05:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 05:19, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:JuanCampMeet1.jpg


The file File:JuanCampMeet1.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused photo."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MGA73 (talk) 20:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)