User talk:DanielgalvinOBE

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Galvin (2) (October 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Galvin (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Daniel_Galvin_(2) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sam_Sailor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Daniel_Galvin_(2) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Draft:Daniel Galvin (2). Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your comments at Draft talk:Daniel Galvin (2)
Per my comments at Draft talk:Daniel Galvin (2), if as you say you are a "third party" writer and not actually Daniel Galvin, your username is a violation of Username policy. I strongly suggest that you change your username. You can do this at Changing username. Please note also that you are subject to the terms of use with respect to paid editing and must comply with them. Also, since this draft has virtually identical material to ones created by User:DanielGalvin1 and User:Colourguru2015, are these also your accounts? If so, please read our policy on the use of multiple accounts. Voceditenore (talk) 11:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Clarification needed on your account status
On User talk:Sam Sailor, you stated that your name was "Sonia Lall". However earlier that day on Draft talk:Daniel Galvin (2) you stated that your name was "Jessica Psaila". Is this account being used by 2 different people? If not, why have you claimed to be two different people? This needs to be sorted out because shared accounts (and passwords) are forbidden on Wikipedia. Voceditenore (talk) 18:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Despite the fact that you have edited Sam Sailor's talk page today and are obviously aware of the messages here, you have ignored my question. Are Jessica Psalia and Sonia Lall, both editing from this account? Voceditenore (talk) 18:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello DanielgalvinOBE. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Daniel Galvin (2). Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Further for the record I notice that "you" in on 13:48, 15 October 2015‎ said, and 24 minutes later "you" said in  that. I then notice that the company Psaila PR founded by Jessica Psaila lists Daniel Galvin as a current client, and that the Social Media and Press Assistant at Psaila PR is one Sonia Lall.Sam Sailor Talk! 10:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * No, only one Sonia Lall but I used Jessica Psaila as she is my boss and overseas everything. I am getting to grips of how to use this and was confused as to whether there was a conversation between yourself and Sam or to me. Jessica Psaila (talk) 13:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I assume this is an answer to my question about a shared account in the section above this one (Clarification needed on your account status) In future, please put your response in the appropriate section rather than tacking it onto a random section. If Jessica Psaila is your employer and "oversees" everything, does she have the password to this account? Yes or No?


 * Note also that you cannot impersonate someone else either via your username (impersonating Daniel Galvin OBE) or via your signature (impersonating Jessica Psalia).


 * I'm going to ask an administrator to help sort this out. If there is sufficient reason to believe that the password to this account has been shared, it will be permanently blocked and you will need to register an entirely new account whose name conforms to Wikipedia's username policy and whose password will be known and used only by you. If the administrator believes the account has not been shared, then at the bare minimum, you will required to change your username which currently impersonates a living person. There is a process for changing your username which the administrator will explain to you. Voceditenore (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

I hope I am replying in the right place. Yes this account will need to be deleted and blocked then as the password has been shared and we were unaware of the rules. Thanks for your helpJessica Psaila (talk) 14:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing as an account shared by several people, which is not allowed. Note that if you create a new, individual, account, you must still acknowledge any connection you have with Daniel Galvin. If you're employed by him, you must state this on the talkpage of any article about him that you edit. See WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY. See also the Wikimedia Foundations terms of use. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)