User talk:Danielgoulartvieira

Block

 * 1) You have stated that you are considering taking court action in connection with your editing of Wikipedia. For anyone who is in legal dispute with the Wikimedia Foundation, or with one or more people in connection with work for Wikipedia, to be editing Wikipedia while the legal dispute is still unresolved is likely to cause a conflict of interest and other problems. Therefore Wikipedia policy is that anyone who is undertaking, or has indicated that they are considering undertaking, legal action in connection with Wikipedia related matters must not edit Wikipedia as long as that action is in progress or pending.
 * 2) You have been warned above about posting unverifiable material, and I have specifically informed you above that if you continued to post fictitious material, such as fantasy pages, you would be likely to be blocked from editing. You have, as you know, continued after that to post material which you have made up yourself. You have also continued to do other unconstructive things which you had been warned about. You have already been blocked for a short time, which made no difference to your disruptive editing.
 * 3) For both of those reasons you have been blocked indefinitely from editing.
 * 4) If at some time in the future you decide you would like to return to editing Wikipedia, but this time making useful contributions to the encyclopaedia, you may post a request to be unblocked. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text  at the bottom of this talk page, replacing the words "Your reason here" with appropriate text. In order to have a chance of being unblocked, you will need to confirm that you are no longer pursuing or contemplating any kind of legal action, and you will also need to persuade an administrator that your future editing will avoid the problems there have been until now. JBW (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * My insistence is that because of your provocations the image of the king, and your intransigence and lack of consent, according to my correctness of the page, you see, more rigorous policies have emerged through the legislation of the countries mentioned above, which will give you legal sanctions for spreading untruths and falsely accusing those that are constantly relevant in the articles. In this case, I say that you commit vandalism, in addition to moral aggression, you are the administrators of Wikipedia, as you support incomplete, outdated, irrelevant texts and in this case, harm to majesty. Danielgoulartvieira (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Unblock my user on Wikipedia

 * This makes no sense. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks--  Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock me to contribute to Wikipedia
Prior requests must remain on this page until the block is removed, see WP:BLANKING. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)