User talk:Danielkob

December 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 20:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I've left you this warning as you are obviously the same person as and you haven't taken any notice of the advice given to you here: User_talk:Dkobialka01. Wikipedia is not here to promote the company you work for and if you can't see how what you wrote is promotional then you need to stop and ask for advice. SmartSE (talk) 20:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I would like to get feedback if possible on the content that I added. Can you take a second look at the revisions I made? A lot of the content in the revisions I made was linked to outside sources, and I want to make sure the Wikipedia page doesn't come across as promotional. I appreciate any advice you can provide. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielkob (talk • contribs)


 * The main problem is still the sourcing. Yes you have included independent references, but the ones I looked at  make no mention of the company whatsoever, so can't be used as sources. This in Forbes is worth using though. Having 'case studies', 'products', 'primary markets' etc. is entirely promotional, unless there have been multiple, independent articles written about them (which I doubt there are). WP:COI strongly suggests that you don't edit the article at all, but if you want to continue, you should aim to fix the problems that have already been identified in the current version, rather than adding more. It's better to focus on the generalities than on the specifics i.e. what the system does, rather than how it has been used. Get rid of language like "has grown to support clients", "critical", "crucial" etc. Make it sound boring. SmartSE (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2013 (UTC)