User talk:Daniellevarona

A tag has been placed on Church solutions magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  18:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Corporate Logo Magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  18:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Professional Door Dealer Magazine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  18:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

standards
You have inquired about our standards for professional magazines--as one of the Wikipedia administrators interested in such things, i have checked the listings to which you refer. The basic criterion for professional magazines is that they not be devoted primarily to advertising, and that they are referred to in the professional literature--and not just by sister magazines. This needs to be demonstrated by references to reliable sources. In additional, articles about them need to be descriptive and encyclopedic: articles about any product, however important, will be removed if their primary purpose is to advertise the product and not inform about it in the way that an encyclopedia would.
 * None of your articles meet the standard for article quality: in general all text in all articles devoted to telling the importance of the product will be deleted, and if there is not sufficient to stand on its only, the articles will be deemed advertising and removed.
 * As for the other items listed on the page, I am presently removing several of them that were clearly not justified by their content and did not have established articles, and have arranged for the writing of articles for the ones that seemed appropriate. One of somewhat dubious merit has additionally been removed in the past month following a group discussion to establish consensus, and another is under such review. We are indeed concerned about fairness, and comments such as yours are important in helping maintain the standards--and, as you see--are acted on promptly.
 * Please feel free to contact me about articles you may be thinking of writing to see if they are likely to be accepted. My own opinion is by no means always accepted, and I cannot in the least assure you that what I like will be accepted by the community--we do not work that way--but I can certainly help you check whether something is certain to be deleted.  Any such article actually inserted onto Wikipedia is subject to deletion by any other administrators, and you may therefore wish to  contact me on my talk page or by email from the link provided on my user page.   DGG 22:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)