User talk:Danielmoran99

Speedy deletion of Paloma torres
A tag has been placed on Paloma torres requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Please don't disrupt the site by attempting to contest the deletion of this article. This is viewed as vandalism and may lead to the loss of your edit privileges if it continues.  Thanks.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I should also warn you that engaging in an edit war over this will lead to a suspension of your account on a 3RR violation. If you'd like to continue editing here, please read the guidelines which Reallyhick provided and kindly let the administrators do their work. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

You've broken the 3RR rule already. One more reversion will automatically alert the administrative staff and you'll lose your edit privileges. Please give it a rest. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)