User talk:Danielray15

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Davison Design & Development. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GDallimore (Talk) 17:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Sockpuppets
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Danielray15. Thank you.GDallimore (Talk) 18:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating our three revert rule using this account and your sockpuppet, as you did at Davison Design & Development. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  At am a  頭 22:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC) If you continue to remove content from that article without discussing it after this block expires, you can be blocked for a longer time, possibly indefinitely. If you continue to create new accounts to edit that page (either to avoid a block or to support this account) you will likely be blocked indefinitely. When this block expires, bring your concerns about the article to the talk page and work with other editors to settle your dispute. That is the only way that the changes to that article that you are trying to implement will be given consideration. --  At am a  頭 22:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history at Davison Design & Development shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —BarrelProof (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)