User talk:Danielsherman88

February 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Assisted living. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Kinu t/c 19:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Please be aware that Wikipedia requires content to be backed up by reliable sources that are independent of the topic. A source is considered reliable if it has an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. An independent source is one with no financial interest in or direct influence by the subject. This heavily favours mainstream journalism like major news organizations, academic press, and reputable publishers of books, magazines and newspapers.

Unacceptable sources include sites whose content is user-generated. Blogs are a prime example, as are social media sites like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Instagram. Being self-published, they lack the required editorial control to be considered reliable. Likewise, a primary source affiliated with the subject cannot be considered reliable, as it lacks independence. except to verify basic facts and figures, but not interpretations of those facts. Therefore, a subject's website, or interviews with the subject or representatives can only be used sparingly.

You can review Reliable sources/Perennial sources to view a list of commonly-discussed sources and the Wikipedia community's evaluation of their reliability. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

globally renamed BoomersHub to Danielsherman88
globally renamed BoomersHub to Danielsherman88 -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)