User talk:Danielthrows

Wikipedia Articles I Am Working On
1. Wesley Eisold http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Eisold - I will be mostly adding content here, and doing some copyediting.

2. Heartworm Press http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartworm_Press - Mostly adding content here.

3. XO Skeletons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XO_Skeletons - Created this page

Hi Dan! I see the stub you're editing, "Heartworm Press" lacks citations. Perhaps you could find websites or music books that are based or published in Philadelphia, or find music artists that state anything about Heartworm Press? They might have helpful information. Good luck! HolleighGraham (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dan. I'm not very familiar with Heartworm Press, but you added a lot of good information. I was able to learn a bit more about Heartworm Press through the content you added. Nice work. --Jlphaneuf (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Dan, I was very impressed with what you have done so far on the article you created for "XO Skeletons". I think that the information you presented offers an unbiased and straightforward presentation of the group, making it accesible for all wikiusers as well as a solid foundation for the page. Take care and best of luck. Mledfo1 (talk) 01:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Graduate Managing Editor
Danielthrows (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC) Hi Dan! Just checking in to see how your wiki project is coming along. The lists that you have compiled for each stub is impressive, nice work! It looks like you will just need to work on developing the content further. How is your research coming along? You might want to think about adding sections to the Wesley stub such as 'Early life', 'Present life, 'Career', etc. Has Heartworm press hosted any other events or won any awards? That may be something you want to add. Please let me know if you have any questions or need assistance. Best of luck!:) --Sosorno (talk) 01:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Interesting topic you chose. Here's a link that may be useful http://www.imposemagazine.com/features/an-interview-with-wes-eisold-of Chadwickcrawford (talk) 11:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I think you've added lots of really interesting content to your pages. I enjoyed reading them very much-well done!--Jmulle5 (talk) 17:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

You're work on Heartworm press was very detailed and impressive. This wasn't something I had ever heard of, it must have been a lot of research to compile as much as you did. My only suggestion would be trying to work more references into the article. --Sphill9 (talk) 02:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

I definitely liked your Heartworm press article, looks like there is a lot of room for growth ! Good job! --Kaitlyn,jones (talk) 04:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Instructor
Hi Dan--Thanks for posting on my Talk Page, and good luck with your Wikipedia project!--Mportolano (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Heartworm Press for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heartworm Press is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heartworm Press until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of XO Skeletons for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XO Skeletons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/XO Skeletons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)