User talk:Danigirl1987

CUP Lists of staff
Lists of staff are not generally considered encyclopedic, especially when the staff themselves are not notable. This has been accepted practice across Wikipedia articles, and is the reason I have removed the lists multiple times from the CUP article. I encourage you to check out WP:NOTDIR for reasons why.

If the point is that some of them have achieved success after being on the CUP board, the better option would be to mention that and list specific examples of notable past members. Otherwise, they will invariably continue to be removed, by myself or others. I would also suggest that you read WP:COI and learn about Wikipedia's guidelines for users with conflicts of interest, which I suspect may be the case here. -Addionne (talk) 15:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)