User talk:Danikraki

July 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ken Mettler. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Ken Mettler. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. GABgab 00:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Really? You're going to block me for updating a person's profile with factual information. This is relevant information, cited, and is factual -- you can't deny what is photographic evidence. And you're blocking me after a single update? Bogus. When did Wikipedia become a conservative apologist?


 * The edits were in clear violation of our policy regarding biographies of living persons - it would be inappropriate for me to comment on the material in any detail. You are free to request an unblock from another administrator, using the instructions in the notice above. GABgab 00:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

They are not a clear violation. And who are you to block me for one infraction even if they were? It was a single infraction. Unblock me. This is bogus. --UTRSBot (talk) 00:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I have submitted an appeal of your invalid action. Either Wikipedia is about the truth or it's not. You seem to have no interest in the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)


 * Wikipedia is not about "truth", but verifiability. - BilCat (talk) 01:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)