User talk:Danimora22

New Standards
You seem to have drawn fire from a self-appointed standards enforcement body that I do not recognize. You might be able to defend your editions with links to descriptions of the journals in question on wikipedia, links to editorials describing a peer review process, or links to changes of that process. 75.152.125.166 (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Version Accepted
I undid a reversion of your work, here, with a citation style more convenient for people to use, because I like that you lead from one place to another, and that your sources are old. Some people on wikipedia are enforcing a guideline against policy, so I want to encourage you with an essay that tells me you can say anything you want on wikipedia if your sources are trustworthy. Content on wikipedia should be dynamic, because consensus about which sources and methods of proof are trustworthy is seldom unanimous. My standards of evidence are very open, until I see bad clues. [mailto:brewjay@spamcop.net Bohgosity BumaskiL] 75.156.177.148 (talk) 12:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Could you rewrite the whole article in a wet style?
It's easy to cut material down to a dry style. Unfortunately, I am not sure that the procedure is always helpful. What good iz it if people do not believe it? 75.156.178.30 (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)