User talk:Danischneier/sandbox

Peer Review
Akhargis1 (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Akhargis1
 * You have lots of really good information and it's really apparent that you understand the topic well.
 * More structure would be nice. Right now there is just a lot of information with no guidance on where to look within those paragraphs to find the specific info that people might be looking for.
 * Nice job with citations.
 * I like how you bolded important words within the article.
 * Excellent job maintaining a neutral and non biased point of view
 * The most important issue for you to fix is just adding in sections to guide readers through the article but otherwise very nice job!

peer review response
Thank you for reviewing my article. I plan to make the bold words links to definitions of what they are, because there is a lot of scientific info that is crucial to this topic I don't want the readers to be confused because they don't know what I am referring to. There is a lot of boring data, so I'm going to try to add some visual effects the help the readers process the information. Danischneier (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)