User talk:Danish.memon85

June 2015
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Ahl al-Hadith has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 15:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=672554741 your edit] to Salafi movement may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddy1. Your recent edit to the page Religion in Saudi Arabia‎ appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Religion in Saudi Arabia‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:15, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Freedom of religion in Saudi Arabia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Qatar, you may be blocked from editing. ''Do not introduce changes in cited information in articles where the terms are sourced. Introducing deliberate factual errors in cited sentences is a violation of wikipedia's policies and you can be blocked from editing'' -- Callinus (talk) 13:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Continuing to use inaccurate edit summaries that misleadingly state "fix typo" after being warned is a form of long term abuse that can cause you to be blocked from editing. -- Callinus (talk) 13:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war over use of the word "Wahhabi" in the articles on Religion in Saudi Arabia, Religion in Qatar and many other pages. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

July 2015
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Sufi–Salafi relations has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This is certainly not "typo fixing". And, there are many similar edit summaries . Stop this practice immediately, please.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:46, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for tendentious editing including edit-warring via your account and IP. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * As you are obviously evading your block via logged-out edits I've extended it to one week.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)