User talk:Danjwilkie

Welcome!
  Hello, Danjwilkie!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Jprg1966  (talk)  18:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Many thanks! Looking forward to working closely with you in the future. Cheers! Danjwilkie (talk) 14:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  16:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * So to avoid copyright violations, should I reference sources, from I took the information, or paraphrase sentences entirely? I read Wikipedia guidelines about that and maybe as an experienced editor provide me with some useful advice. Danjwilkie (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sphilbrick, I think I get the problem now. The section in which I wrote about the Oregon Treaty was actually from a website and I acknowledge it as a grieve mistake. I didn’t actually paraphrased any of the information on the subsection on Europe. I actually wrote it out of an essay I was working on British Foreign policy at University. Danjwilkie (talk) 10:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Henry Addington
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Henry Addington, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Danjwilkie&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1189718660 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Addington&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1189718660%7CHenry%20Addington%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Henry Addington
 * added links pointing to Pepper, Alcohol, Treaty of Bassein and Battle of Delhi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/DantheWikipedian. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Spicy (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I have appealed according to the guidelines that you have put forward and have stated my reasons. I hope you find it acceptable and reasonable to unblock me. Thank you. Danjwilkie (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Regarding My Account
I do not understand why I am blocked and is completely shocked because of this. This must be an confusion because I do not ever have had an another or multiple accounts in that regard. I joined Wikipedia three months ago and couldn’t have ever done any of those things, that the user that I’m being accused of being. This must be an mistake and I ask you kindly to look into this investigation and re-examine the information regarding this. Danjwilkie (talk) 10:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

An Appeal For Unblocking
Danjwilkie (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

A New Appeal
Danjwilkie (talk) 06:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

A Third Appeal

 * Is this sufficient to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Or should user appeal via ? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , by my count they are WP:3X banned and would need to appeal at AN. Besides that, I find the unblock request vague and unconvincing. It doesn't address the copyright issues that led to the block on their original account. Spicy (talk) 22:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't know why we are here and not your original account. Please address the copyright issues dead led to the block on your original account. Spicy points out you banned, and will need your appeal carried to WP:AN Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I can’t carry my appeal there because I am blocked indefinitely, therefore, I cannot raise a issue or a notice for administrators concerning my situation. I can only post an appeal here because this the only place I am permitted to edit my user page and I would have gone to WP:AN long ago if I’m not blocked. Danjwilkie (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

A Fifth Appeal
Alright, I will address this matter again: The block is unnecessary and irrelevant because I did not cause any disruption or contributed any inconvenient information nor did I ever write copyright sources on Wikipedia and never continued any copyright because I joined Wikipedia five months ago from this year. But I would bear full responsibility for copyright violations or any other offence that happened because of me and also the original account that your referring to, is not created by me instead it was created by the previous owner of this phone that I am currently using to write this. I bought it six months ago and I have stated many times that the previous owner of this phone did not clear his browsing history or original accounts, so that is why this phone has that many accounts to begin with. So even if there are copyright violations previously I take full responsibility for that and admit it is very wrong of me to do something like this and also I understand very clearly why I am blocked. Most importantly, I would not continue to disrupt Wikipedia or cause damage to any articles and stop adding misinformation and unreliable sources. And finally I will promise that I will make useful contributions like before and always, seeking to improve articles at every opportunity. Thank You. Danjwilkie (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

A Fourth Appeal
Danjwilkie (talk) 18:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I've been cleaning up after this sockfarm for the past few months and can confirm that the claims in this unblock request are soundly refuted by an abundance of behavioral evidence. I recommend a decline and TPA removal. — Callitropsis🌲&#91;talk · contribs&#93; 03:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 07:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)