User talk:Dankerins

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! The Evil Clown Please review me! 00:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Fair Use policy
In response to your comment about Image:Southampton FC.png, Wikipedia policy is reasonably detailed. The image in question has an appropriate fair use tag, but no rationale. Enforcement of the rationale policy has recently begun.

I invite you to add rationales to any football club logos or other fair use images that you find. I expect that validation of rationales will occur at some time in the future, so try to meet all of the criteria of a good rationale. I've found that the Non-free media rationale template is helpful for including all of the information requested. ~ Bigr  Tex  15:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Coaching Staff
WikiProject U2 invitation

Southampton Urban Area
The list in List of conurbations in the United Kingdom does not contradict with this article, they refer to different areas. Marky-Son 15:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Southampton-FC.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Southampton-FC.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

List of Southampton F.C. players
Hi - I'm trying to extend the List of Southampton F.C. players to include players from 1885 to 1939 as well as post-war players. As far as notability goes, I intend to stick with the 100 games/30 goals concept. But what about players who played in the 2 FA Cup finals in 1900 & 1902, or were Southern League champions 6 times from 1897 to 1904. Then there's the 1921-22 season when they were 3rd Division South champions as well as other promotions. Where do we stop?

I therefore plan to remove players from the existing list who are only there because of their involvement in the 1966 or 1978 promotion seasons e.g. Campbell Forsyth and Mike Pickering, but leave the 1976 FA Cup winning squad (obviously). What about the 2003 FA Cup final squad (Michael Svensson and Chris Baird) - are they sufficiently notable? If so, how are they better (ignoring recentism) than those from 1900 and 1902?

I think the article should perhaps also have a section for Saints players who played for their countries whilst on Saints' books e.g. C. B. Fry. Let me know what you think. I have copied this to the talk page for the article, so perhaps you should respond there. Best wishes & keep the faith. Daemonic Kangaroo 16:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Hagiology Publishing
Thanks for the warning about the AfD. I have just got back from ten days away - fortunately, the result of the AfD was to Keep the article, thanks to your diligence. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo 10:26, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Southampton
While conventions are not set in stone, there should be a very good reason for not abiding by them in the cases where an exception is necessary. The convention was established by consensus, and there is no consensus, either on the Southampton talk page or on the naming convention talk page, to use anything different. If you change the pages back to ", Southampton" it will be you who is going against consensus, as well as engaging in an edit war. Waggers (talk) 10:36, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

ROI football
I don’t think it is necessary to mention how many counties are in the Republic or repeat info that is in infobox e.g. Croke Park. The Republic of Ireland article itself explains the geography. The team is referred to as the Republic of Ireland to distinguish it from both the Ireland national football team (IFA) and the Northern Ireland national football team. Your edit also removes the link to the article England v Ireland (1949). Changes in the teams name and teams achievements should be included in opening para. These can be explained in more detail further down the article. Djln


 * I have no problem with you making improvement but your edits are not improving it. The 1949 match is significant because it marked the arrival of the team on the international scene. Needs to be linked. Djln —Preceding comment was added at 20:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Southampton F.C.
Hi - it's good to see you back. I think you'll find that your recent edit was not quite correct. According to the official site, Rupert Lowe is chairman of Southampton Leisure Holdings PLC and Michael Wilde is chairman of the football club. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Daily Echo front wiki.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Daily Echo front wiki.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/The Winston Hotel Southampton
As someone concerned about Southampton articles, could you add your comments (either way) to this AfD. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 22:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Nicola Cortese
Hi, Dan. I have created an article on Saints' chairman. As your name is mentioned, albeit in a citation, I thought that you might care to take a look. Cheers. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Message from WikiProject U2 (April 2013)
You are receving this because your username is listed in Category:WikiProject U2 members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list.

Cheers.

–p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject U2 invitation
Hello! This message is to inform you that WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

 Miss Bono  [zootalk]  16:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Test for Wikiproject U2
Test message for Wikiproject U2 to see if the membership list runs properly. Sent by Pjoef to Miss Bono and Pjoef only. 13:13, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, it was my fault. The bot does not recognize the  TAG and this message has been sent to all the inactive users of Wikiproject U2. Remove this section whenever you want. Sorry once again. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 13:59, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Old Southampton FC Crest.jpg


The file File:Old Southampton FC Crest.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Derivative work of a copyrighted design."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Daily Echo Masthead.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Daily Echo Masthead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)