User talk:Dankreiner

Welcome!

Hello, Dankreiner, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of MicroIVF or MiniIVF (Minimal Stimulation IVF)


A tag has been placed on MicroIVF or MiniIVF (Minimal Stimulation IVF), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template  to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Syrthiss (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the articles as being =entirely promotional to the technique. There is no reason why an article cannot be written, but it must simply describe the method, not advocate for it. And it should have some much better sources--for medical toopics such as this we normally expect peer-reviwed journal articles from academic journals.  DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 11:16, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkpage of deleted article
"I would like to know if this is worth rewriting... That article came directly from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Whatever they wrote they have nothing to gain from promoting MicroIVF.  Their information is unanimously accepted in the fertility community.  I do not understand how this is still promotional and hesitate having it re-written to just have it denied again for promotional reasons.  Can you elaborate how the most recent submission is promotional?" (written by an IP which I assume is you,.


 * Specifically, the primary problem is the article is being written by YOU. I've advised you about our conflict of interest guidelines, and I guess I didn't stress it enough.  It is bad.  Don't do it.  Now, once we get past that... the last two paragraphs especially sound more like information from a brochure from your office instead of a neutral discussion of a medical procedure.

"We will perform a baseline ultrasound" and "Your physician can provide some medications for pain relief during the procedure, and most patients do well with this approach. You should discuss this matter with your physician before making a final decision." in particular are significant. Perhaps you could review some of the other articles on medical procdures here and then still not write about this topic yourself. My advice? Follow our instructions for conflicted editors and make suggestions about expanding (or adding if it doesn't exist) the section on MIVF on the IVF page here. I hope this helps and apologies for any ill feelings from me having to be so frank. Syrthiss (talk) 11:53, 3 November 2010 (UTC)