User talk:Danmuz

Welcome!
Hello, Danmuz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Thanks!
Hej Danmuz, Thanks for assessing the Dizzy and Mads Langer articles from WikiProject Denmark! I appreciate it :-) --Eddyspeeder (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome :) Danmuz (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Pipe Organ "revival"
What did you have in mind? Are there any pages in particular you'd like to see fleshed out? Cheers! W0lfie (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Good question! I will post my thoughts on what I think should be done on the project discussion page right away. Cheers, Danmuz (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for inviting me to help revive the project. Real life really gets in the way of this sort of thing! But I would love to help out as I have time. For several years I've dreamed of bumping Pipe organ to FA status; perhaps a goal that is too far-fetched for the time being. We might have more luck with other articles: Organ pipe might not be too difficult, for example. —Cor anglais 16 01:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome and thanks for helping! It would be great to get Pipe Organ to FA, but I'm not sure what it would take to get there? What need to be improved? Good idea about Organ Pipe, a good place to start with that article is adding references to the article. I think that alone could make it a B-class article. Danmuz (talk) 09:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reminding about  WikiProject Pipe Organ! I try to do here something, when I have a time.--Jyriorgan1 (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you also for reminding me. As with the previous user I can try to do something when I have time, but it will have to be something small and specific. Best wishes for reviving this project! RGB2 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for responding, Jyriorgan1 and RGB2! We can of course all only do so much as we have time to, but everything helps, and I think it is worthwhile to keep the project alive. Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Reviving WikiProject PipeOrgan
Danmuz,

I would like to help revive this project.

a) I made a recommendation to include a list of notable organists.

b) We should merge "Pipe organ" with "Organ pipe"

c) the world's largest pipe organs should be a list on the main page "Pipe organ"

d) Need lots more links to video and music and photos

bewporteous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bewporteous (talk • contribs) 21:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello, Bewporteous,

Thanks for contributing to the project with ideas! Starting backwards I agree it's a good idea with more multimedia content. Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure whether a list of the largest organs should go into the pipe organ article itself, but a link to the current list should definitely be easier to find in the article - and speaking of that list, it could use improvement!
 * Merging Pipe Organ with Organ Pipe would probably make the Pipe Organ article too extensive, I think
 * How would your list of notable organists differ from the current List of organists?

Rollback
I saw no concerns in your rollback request so I've gone ahead and gave you the rollback right. Please keep in mind our policies about its use, specifically never use it in a content dispute, stick to using it for vandalism :) And when in doubt, assume good faith, always :) Feel free to direct any questions you might have to me or any other admin. Cheers,  Snowolf How can I help? 07:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will do my best to use the tool wisely and live up the trust! Cheers, Danmuz (talk) 07:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello there
Hi Danmuz, as you might have guessed, I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so would like to understand more about why you're assisting Saddhiyama in promulgating misinformation about the true origins of what we now know as Lego blocks. I only have an interest in the correct information, and my goal isn't to vandalise anything or cause anyone disrespect. However, the version that Saddhiyama keeps on reverting to has the "development" of Lego blocks in Denmark, when it is clearly in England (origin). I would very much appreciate your suggestion as to how we can have this error corrected other than me being continually accused of vandalism (which, again, is not m intent). thanks, Robin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.212.234 (talk) 09:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Robin, I will answer you here. First of all, thanks for the civil and constructive message. My goal was (and is) not to assist Saddhiyama or any particular editor, but an edit-war has erupted over the edits you are proposing at the article Lego. Since the edits you wish to make are a serious change to the (until now) established consensus regarding the article, hence it is your edits that has been reverted. The way to go from here is to take the discussion on the Lego Talk page, where you can state your case backed up by reliable sources (Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a source), and if your sources are good enough possibly a new consensus will be established. That is the way it works on Wikipedia. It may seem cumbersome but it is necessary for Wikipedia to function. Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 11:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * (PS: I see now that you have already started a discussion on the Talk Page today, which is the right course of action. Regards, Danmuz (talk) 11:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC))

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Thanks for the coffee! --Danmuz (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Revert
I talked to User:Milonica and told him/her that the issue has been resolved, they went to tell me that it was okay to blank my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.132.67.105 (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Wiki content being re-published elsewhere?
Danmuz are you aware of this?: http://www.doctorsmedicalopinion.com/wiki/User_talk:Danmuz ←Pohutukawa (talk) 21:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello, Pohutukawa, I hadn't seen that particular site before, but there are many similar sites that scrapes content from Wikipedia in order to "trick" people into visiting the site when using search engines. I find it annoying, but apparently they are not doing anything illegal since Wikipedia content is released under a creative commons licence. --Danmuz (talk) 08:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Frederik Magle
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Precious
Thank you very, very much, Gerda! I appreciate a lot - not least coming from a truly awesome Wikipedian like you! --Danmuz (talk) 14:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * A year ago, you were the 251st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Organ Club - AfD discussion
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Organ Club. —Waldhorn (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus
Hello, I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 20:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Seeking assessment of St. Wilfrid Club article (NYC-area organists)
Hi Danmuz, I see you're one of the more-active participants in WikiProject Pipe Organ -- much appreciated! I recently tagged St. Wilfrid Club for inclusion in the project, since it's a notable club of organists in the Greater New York area -- and (as a non-member) I've done a bit of work on the article. I doubt it'll ever rise above "Low" importance (primarily for specialists), and I'm sure there are still some Wikipedia "style" issues -- but I think by now the content might be sufficient to raise the article from Stub to "B" quality rating. Is there a standard procedure for assessment? Please feel free to take a look (at your convenience), and see what you think. Thank you kindly for your consideration. Patrug (talk) 11:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Patrug! Great work you have done on that article. Yes, you are right, it will likely not rise above "low" on the project importance scale, but that of course does not mean the topic is not worthwhile, just that it is, as you say, primarily of interest for specialists. Regarding the Quality scale you can see a general description of the levels here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedia/Assessment#Quality_scale. After your expansion and other improvements the article is certainly no longer a "stub", and in fact it is very close to "C" class, but mainly because it currently relies on a single source I have assessed it as "start" class. It still have some way to go before reaching B, but "C" should be within reach with just a few improvements (especially more references). Regards, --Danmuz (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Danmuz, thanks very much. While the article is fully referenced for its notable past members, unfortunately there's just one known reference describing the St. Wilfrid Club itself (since it's a private organization). Sorry if this keeps the article in "Start" class and leaves "C" class out of reach. -Patrug (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, Patrug. I'm sorry I could not assess it higher at this point, but don't lose hope. It is a problem that their is only a single source. The sources about the individual members are unfortunately irrelevant in regard to the St Wilfrid Club itself, unless it is specifically mentioned. Speaking of the individual members, the list should probably also conform with the norm for embedded lists in order for the article to reach a C class assessment. See: WP:EMBED. internal links (even if the article is not yet written) would also be preferred instead of the external links. Back to the issue of the single source; are you sure that no additional sources can be found? The club has been in existence since 1908, and even if it is a private club something must have been written. --Danmuz (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Danmuz -- now the links for club members are better. After months of searching online & offline, neither I nor the club officers have been able to find another published reference source describing the club. If we eventually do, it looks like the article already satisfies the other guidelines for "B" quality (criteria 2 through 6). If we can't expand beyond the single source, it looks like we'll have permanent "Start" quality. -Patrug (talk) 08:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, Danmuz. Over the past year or two, I've gradually added more info & refs for the St. Wilfrid Club article. The club was actually the subject of a meeting announcement in The New York Times (ref #14), and the club was specifically mentioned in the NYT obits of several notable members (ref #4,6,11,15,17,20,31). Together with the main journal citation (ref #1), are these enough to overcome the "single source" objection from Dec 2013 (above)? If so, I think the article now meets the six criteria for "B" class. Many thanks if you agree. —Patrug (talk) 11:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

IPA forespørgsel
Goddag Danmuz! Så er der anført en IPA-udtale på Frederik Magle som ønsketHøst (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC).
 * Tak for det, Høst! Det er en stor hjælp. --Danmuz (talk) 08:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frederik Magle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frederik Magle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- 02:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Frederik Magle
I've begun a GA review. I found a few issues, but they're of the "this is going to pass, just not immediately" sort; I'd be shocked if this doesn't get to GA. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * And it's passed now. As I thought. Great work, and good luck pushing it to featured article! Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Adam! For reviewing and passing it, and for the encouragement to take it to FA! I will certainly look into that in the future. --Danmuz (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frederik Magle
The article Frederik Magle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frederik Magle for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposal
There is currently a discussion, you might be interested in, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Inclusion_of_Amazon.2C_Spotify.2C_iTunes.2C_Beatport_under_digital_charts Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
  Danish music

Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Danish composers such as Frederik Magle, for good gnome work and for your effort to revive project PipeOrgan, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Two years ago, you were the 251st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Seven years ago, you were recipient no. 251 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivar Frounberg


A tag has been placed on Ivar Frounberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aust331 (talk) 09:58, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Always precious
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)