User talk:Danny-m-thomas

Welcome!
Hello, Danny-m-thomas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Theranos does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 01:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Preparation H has been reverted. Your edit here to Preparation H was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFkIZ-Zf32Y|youtube) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

"In popular culture" sections
Hello Danny-m-thomas, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia articles. However, I noticed that you added several "In popular culture" sections without independent reliable secondary sources. Generally, such entries should only be added if they have been covered by such independent secondary sources (for example in a review or news coverage). The inclusion of mere passing mentions and other relatively minor usages is generally discouraged. Regarding "reliable" sources, you'll find a comprehensive guideline to identify such sources at WP:RS (blogs and forums for instance are not considered reliable). I hope these tips are helpful, but please feel free to ask if you have any further questions. You can also post for advice at WP:Teahouse, a good forum for new editors. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)