User talk:Danny kingsfan20

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gwen Stefani, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rdp060707&#124;talk 04:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi I'm the reliable source I'm friends with Gwen stefani she recently got married and she has said that she's going by Gwen Renee Stefani Shelton Danny kingsfan20 (talk) 04:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

No, it does not work that way an reliable source has to come from AN Reliable Site itself, the source needs to come from an article, That is the way it works at Wikipedia Chip3004 (talk) 04:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Like a media site Danny kingsfan20 (talk) 04:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Talk to people magazine their a reliable source they cover everything related to Blake Shelton and Gwen stefani Danny kingsfan20 (talk) 04:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Gwen Stefani. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Rdp060707&#124;talk 05:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. And I've personally had enough. I'm reporting you for edit warring, take it to the talk page and work out consensus. People are NOT reliable sources, you need to find one online in a major publication or newspaper and include that link in your edits. Timmccloud (talk) 21:44, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I'm new to Wikipedia and have never done edits before I'll stop and learn how to use Wikipedia the right way Danny kingsfan20 (talk) 06:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Editing and sources
How can I edit without getting banned I'm new and need some pointers on where to find reliable sources for my edits Danny kingsfan20 (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * In that case...

Welcome!
Hi Danny kingsfan20! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kinksfan20, please pay particular attention to these links:
 * Original Research, which led you to make your edits. Nothing wrong with that, but then its like a school paper: Follow it up with references your teacher accepts are reliable. Which brings us to Citing Sources and Reliable Sources (and make note of the exceptions to the rules as well as the rules themselves).You also failed to gain Consensus after the reverts started happening.  Best bet is after the first revert, leave the article as it was (if you are adding content), or revert to the last "Good edit" (If you are removing content).  Then go to the articles talk page (like this is YOUR talk page, EVERY page has a talk page).  This is where editors go to discuss disagreements.  Keep it cordial, and WP:Assume Good Faith as your default setting; I am guilty of this one in our interactions, so you deserve my apology.  I was trying to stop the edit war, and then I found your talk page almost entirely taken up by warnings about this edit, and I see so many pages of people like this every time I log in and see disruptive edits in my WP:Watchlist, I had a knee jerk reaction and I'm sorry.  I did not assume good faith in your edits, and I was wrong. Now some of these links I've posted here are are Policies and guidelines, you should learn the distinctions between the two and learn when you can fudge the rules a little (guidelines) and when it's always out of bounds (Policies).
 * I would suggest you add the gwen stefani page AND the gwen stefani talk page to your favorites/watchlist to learn how this works (might I guess that you might also watch the kings page?). How we discover WP:edit wars. Use prose more than lists, but lists where appropriate in your edits. Learn how to report someone or a group of someone's that starts pissing YOU off to the admins. Which is what I did - notice that Gwen's page is on an edit pause - only established editors (with more than 6 months experience and a good record) can edit for a while. This will slow down accidental (or intentional) disruptive edits like you tripped over, as after a few months under your belt and your will understand how not to run afoul of the rules and be really productive. Finally when you are ready for your first article, learn how to use your WP:Sandbox, and if you are interested in feedback drop me a line anytime. I am on irregularly but I monitor my 600+ page watchlist daily for new things to learn, fix honest mistakes, and clean up after the vandals.
 * Good for you for assenting your self and calling me out on Assume Good Faith, and I want you to continue to WP:BE BOLD. Continue to ping me if you have questions, and I also run the Wikipedians (en) group over on linked in - it's a little quiet over there but new members are always welcome. I've been on Wikipedia for 15 years, and have authored three articles (two which survived consensus).  BE BOLD!  Timmccloud (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2021 (UTC)