User talk:Dannyboy1209

Danny, I have removed talk page access. If you wish to appeal this block going forward, you may email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or submit a request for unblock to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Finally, you have the right to appeal this block to the Ban appeals sub-committee.  Worm TT( talk ) 16:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Block note
I have provided Dannyboy1209 information regarding standard offer via UTRS. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 01:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Dannyboy1209 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. TBrandley 21:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * ...and his recent socking at AN doesn't help (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Is he socking through an account or an IP? We should probably put that information in an SPI just so it is archived, it makes catching future socks easier. Ryan Vesey 12:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * He was socking through this IP today. Voceditenore (talk) 12:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * And apparently again today. I've blocked the IP for one week. According to Geolocate, it's a static IP, so someone more familiar with this case could make the block longer.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  TheGeneralUser  (talk)  14:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Unblocked by Ban Appeals Subcommittee, restricted to one account
The Ban Appeals Subcommittee has considered your appeal, and decided to unblock you under the terms of Wikipedia's standard offer. You are unblocked under the following conditions:
 * You must edit only from this account (User:Dannyboy1209) only. If you deliberately edit anonymously, or edit from any other account, without permission from the Wikipedia community or this subcommittee, you may be summarily and indefinitely reblocked by any uninvolved administrator.
 * For three months from the date of this message, if you (in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator) edit in a disruptive manner, you may be summarily, indefinitely reblocked with no further warning.

For the Ban Appeals Subcommittee, AGK  [•] 12:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 Go  Phightins  !  19:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Block restored
Danny, since your block has been lifted, the only edits I can see are three nonsensical questions and conversations at various reference desks. Edits such as this are clearly disruptive. Frankly, I cannot tell if this is deliberate trolling, or simply an acute lack of situational awareness. As per your unblock conditions, I have reinstated the indefinite block until you can convince some other administrator that you are here for some reason other than to troll editors donating time at the reference desk. Kuru  (talk)  15:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

I will try to edit more constructively and update local articles. drt2012 (talk) 19:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Restore my userpage please drt2012 (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

3rd (and 4th) unblock request

 * Airline pilots are much too overworked (www.naturalnews.com/039310_airline_pilots_work_stress_safety.html ) to have time to carry out the duties of a Wikipedia bureaucrat or administrator. You will need to choose either being an airline pilot or being a Wikipedia functionary, not both at the same time. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)