User talk:Dannyboy gallagher

Why do you all Keep on deleting my pages.. Have you people got a life of your own.. Go on stick your nose in your business and don't go around my pages.

'James did you leave me message someplace?

'''Hi ya All.

Can someone more experience then me, go to my Sandbox page and check out my new page. Thanks a lot...

Hello people.

I am about to create a page on Wikipedia and I know I will need advise on what information to add on here and how I go about adding it..

I know, I should not copy and pace on here, but I will be adding small a mounts as I go a long.

Any feedback will be great full.

Thanks in advance.. Danny..

Thank you JohnCD, for moving my message.

Now I know how and where to communicate with you and others on wikipeadia..

JohnCD I will be reading more information on wikipeadia on what directions that I need to take before I start to create A new page.

Now if you and other wikipeadias can share your expertise on this page with me, then that will be fantastic As I can see my messages and all your messages and details..

Thanks.

Dannyboy.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannyboy gallagher (talk • contribs) 02:58, 18 September 2012‎

''Dannyboy, I have moved your new messages to the bottom of the talk page, because it is important to keep the conversation in order and that is where people will look for new messages. JohnCD (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)'''

Hello, Dannyboy gallagher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kürbis (✔) 09:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Amateur Boxing Club


A tag has been placed on Angel Amateur Boxing Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kürbis (✔) 09:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Amateur Boxing Club


A tag has been placed on Angel Amateur Boxing Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kürbis (✔) 09:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Amateur Boxing Club


A tag has been placed on Angel Amateur Boxing Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  12:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Amateur Boxing Club


A tag has been placed on Angel Amateur Boxing Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Del ♉ sion 23  (talk)  16:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Last warning
If you recreate the article again, you will be blocked. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel boxing club


A tag has been placed on Angel boxing club, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rorshacma (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel amerture boxing club
Hello Dannyboy gallagher,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Angel amerture boxing club for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Hydriz (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Angel amerture boxing club
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Angel amerture boxing club. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Angel amerture boxing club. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Angel amerture boxing club, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi Dannyboy gallagher, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported your removal of speedy deletion templates at Angel amerture boxing club to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 10:53, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel amerture boxing club


A tag has been placed on Angel amerture boxing club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mediran  talk 11:00, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Advice about editing problems
If you wish to return to editing after the block expires, as well as the issues mentioned above, you should be aware of the following problems.
 * A Wikipedia article needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and it is not acceptable to add your own commentary or opinions. For example, saying that a boxer was "showing his heart and determintion" [sic], or that a trainer is "fantastic" or "great", or describing a fight as "one of the most one sided fights seen" is unacceptable.
 * Much of your editing has been promotional in character. For example, your repeatedly created pages about the Angel Amateur Boxing Club have been unambiguously written with the intention of telling us how great the club is. Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of any sort.
 * Information must be capable of being verified by provision of reliable sources. You should not insert content purely on the basis of your personal knowledge, without any independent evidence being available.
 * You should generally avoid writing about subjects to which you have a close personal connection, as it is likely to be difficult in such cases to write neutrally, even if you intend to do so. This includes, for example, writing about yourself, other members of your family, organisations that you or your relatives are or have belonged to, and so on.
 * I'm afraid your command of English is not perfect, with the result that some of your writing is not of the standard that we like. Some things (such as "determintion" for "determination" in the quote above) may be just slips, but sometimes there have been mistakes which go beyond that. For example, you have repeatedly written "amerture" for "amateur", suggesting that it is more than just a slip. There have even been occasions when you have changed perfectly good English written by someone else into something less good.
 * You have removed quite a number of maintenance tags from articles, particularly "citation needed" tags. Such tags serve a useful purpose, in calling attention to content that has been questioned or doubted, and that may need to be either provided with sources or else removed. Removing such tags is not helpful.

I am sorry to have to present you with what may seem a rather daunting list of problems, but I think that it is actually likely to be more helpful to let you know what the problems are than to simply let you keep on editing without knowing about them, and possibly continuing to find yourself blocked without knowing why. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Reply to your email
The advice JamesBWatson has given you is good. All that I would add is: My advice is, give up the idea of writing about your club on Wikipedia. You will just be wasting your time. There are plenty of other sites that would be happy to let you write about it - try Myspace or Facebook. JohnCD (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You asked "Please can you remove your block status on my blog." But Wikipedia is not a place to write a blog, that's not what an encyclopedia is for.
 * Anything added to Wikipedia has to be verifiable from reliable published sources. You can't write about things here on the basis that you personally know them.
 * Another reason why Wikipedia needs sources is to show that a subject is notable enough to have an article. That means giving references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." You have to show that other people, not connected with the club, have thought it important enough to write substantial content about.

Angel Amateur Boxing Club
Hi, thanks for email. I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. As the comment above says, this is an encyclopaedia, not a blog. It was also written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ''It has a great boxing history... many fantastic Trainers And fighters... Great trainers... had a successful career''

It's possible that the club might be notable because of the boxers it's produced, but because you give no sources, and don't link the boxers to their Wikipedia articles (if they have them), it's hard to tell. If you feel it's worth trying to write a neutral, referenced article, do so here and let me know whrn you are ready  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)


 * }

Reply to your email (2)
I have just read your emails. I will try to answer your questions.
 * 1) You say you would like to know why your account is blocked. You will see if you look above that you were told at 10:45 on 14 September "This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Angel amerture boxing club, you may be blocked from editing without further notice", so you should not have been surprised that, when you removed the same notice again at 10:52 on the same day, you were blocked. You had also already been told, 13 September, "If you recreate the article again, you will be blocked", and you did so. Other problems with your editing are explained above, but either of two things, which you had been told would lead to a block, would have been enough. Either one of them might have led to perhaps a 24 hour block, but the combination of the other problems, which have already been explained to you, led to the block being longer.
 * 2) You say "There is a lot of people and fans that would like to see more information about the Angel Boxing Club". However, that is not the criterion that Wikipedia uses to decide what can be accepted. The most important consideration is "notability". You should look at the general notability guideline and the guideline on organisations to see what sort of thing is needed. If, when you have read those guidelines, you can show that the Angel Amateur Boxing Club does satisfy them, then you are welcome to rewrite the article on it. However, I'm afraid that my impression is that it probably does not satisfy those guidelines, in which case writing an article about it is likely to be a waste of your time, as it will probably be deleted again. If you do decide it is notable enough, then make sure you take not of what you have been told above about reliable sources and promotion, as otherwise the article will be deleted, even if its subject is notable.

I am genuinely sorry that you have had such a bad introduction to editing Wikipedia. If your only interest is in writing about the subjects you have started on, rather than on other subjects, then it may be that you would be better off writing on some other site than Wikipedia, such as blogspot or wikia. However, if you would like to carry on editing Wikipedia, I am giving you a rather longer "Welcome" message than the one that Kürbis put at the top of this page. It has links to various pages that may help you. Don't try to read and learn all of them, as there is far too much there to take in at one go. However, do look at the pages that look most relevant to what you want to do.

I will also give you one more piece of advice. Start by making little improvements to existing articles, instead of writing whole new articles. That way, you can gradually learn how Wikipedia works, and nay mistakes you make will be small ones, so you won't lose lots of work. After a while, you will know better what sort of thing is acceptable, and then maybe you can write an article from scratch. This is just my advice, and it's up to you, but I think that way you would have a better chance.

I hope these comments are some help to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Messages moved from top of talk page
Hi everyone, I need advise about how to edit this honest and very reliable information that I am trying to share with wikipeadia.. If look at the details about the Angel amerture Boxing club, Below my message to JamesBWatson..

If someone on here can correct me on what I should do now, I would appreciate it very much.. Thank you in advance.. Danny.

Message for JamesBWatson.

I have a question, has the block on my account being taking off.

If yes, then can I go a head and try to creat another page.

This is information Below, that I would like to have on the Angel boxing Club page.. If this is not suitable for Wikipedia, then can help me to make a suitable page..

Thank you, Danny.

(Draft article moved to User:Dannyboy gallagher/sandbox 2 to keep this talk page clear. JohnCD (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC))


 * I have moved your entries down to the bottom of the page - that is where new additions go, so as to keep the conversation in order.


 * Dannyboy, it does not seem that you are reading any of the advice that people are giving you. If you are to contribute to Wikipedia, you have got to read what people say to you and take notice of it. I will tell JamesBWatson that you have written to him here, but I can answer your questions:


 * Your block was for a week from 14 September. That means it will end on 21 September.
 * Then you will be able to submit articles again, but if you just go on putting in the same article, it will be deleted again, and you will very likely be blocked again for wasting everyone's time.
 * No, what you wrote that you wanted to put in (which I have put into User:Dannyboy gallagher/sandbox 2 to keep this talk page clear) is not suitable, for all the reasons that have already been explained to you above. Did you not read User talk:Dannyboy gallagher, where JamesBWatson took a lot of trouble to explain that you must write from a neutral point of view and not try to promote the club: but here you are again writing "many fantastic Trainers... proudly represented the Club... " etc.
 * What goes into Wikipedia must be not opinions, but facts, and they need to be verifiable from reliable sources. You haven't given any sources for what you say.
 * What you wrote is almost all about Gallagher, but there is already an article about him at P. J. Gallagher (boxer). The fact that a notable boxer belonged to the club does not mean that the club is notable enough to have its own article: you would have to show that by finding significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources about the club.
 * Read Your first article which tells you how to write acceptable articles.
 * And before you ask any more questions, please read all the advice on this talk page which people have taken a lot of trouble to write for you. JohnCD (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Since you said that your message was for me, I will just say that I agree with everything JohnCD has said, and I have nothing else to add. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France 3470   ( talk ) 22:27, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Smartse, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you.  Theo polisme  21:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ANGEL AMERTURE BOXING CLUB


A tag has been placed on ANGEL AMERTURE BOXING CLUB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Zappa  O  Mati   21:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Spencer T♦ C 22:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)