User talk:Dannyrilson

Welcome!
Hello, Dannyrilson, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Dannyrilson, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Waqar ( talk ) 19:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dannyrilson


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Dannyrilson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waqar ( talk ) 19:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ikwerre people. ''Please provide sources/citations when editing and discuss with others. Claiming parts of an article is disinformation without actually discussing it first or providing actual reliable source (example: academic journals) is disruptive. And please do not do edit warring.'' Nyanardsan (talk) 11:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Nyanardsan Academic sources have been provided on my edit, did you care to read them? My assertion that parts of that article is a disinformation is not a claim but a statement of fact. It's a disinformation aimed at erasing the identity and annexing the Ikwerre Ethnic Group by the Igbo tribe.
 * The Ikwerre People have on several occasions, both on Facebook, Twitter, Radio/TV interviews and declarations disassociated themselves from the concocted history on Wikipedia.
 * Is it not absurd that someone went on Wikipedia in 2008 to write an article about an Ethnic Group's identity and history with all manner of falsification?
 * Ikwerre is an Ethnic group different from Igbo and both do not have ancestral link. Anyone referring to one as a subgroup of the other is only doing so for political agenda.
 * That the article has been edited 800+ times tells you that the original article is filled with disinformation. I'd urge you to research more on the controversy. Dannyrilson (talk) 13:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)