User talk:Dantetheperuvian/Archive 1

If you don't understand English fully then why add incorrect info to articles in that language? Stadio delle Alpi is still Juventus stadium, they own the lease to it understand?... just because it is having its structure changes does not mean it has disapeared into thin air. Its not their "former" stadium, because that is still their legal home and has been since 1990, it isn't been destroyed, abandoned or having a new club play their... its just having work done.

Stadio Olimpico di Torino is Torino F.C.'s stadium and has been since 1990, it doesn't belong to Juve anymore. Torino are just letting Juventus share while their main stadium delle Alpi has some work down. I've worked very hard on getting the Juventus article to "good article" status and it is currently under review to pass it, its highly frustrating when silly things like this keep popping up because of language misunderstandings and could lead to the article failing the review. - 01:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

List
Notice how on both of those article lists, they look absolutely nothing like what you keep doing to Juventus players list? Neither of those two feature an ugly big quote (which goes against our policy) at the top. Take a look at List of Arsenal F.C. players for an idea of how we do them. - 02:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm quite sure that the quote is real, that is besides the point. Repeat these words slowly to yourself.... quote.. against... standard. 0.. none.. zero of the featured lists which you referenced have a great big quote from one player at the top, this is why Wikiquote was created.


 * The things which you keep removing from the top of the list, are standard and have templates especially created to fit them. Also.. you seem to be removing players and adding others for no real reason you remove David Platt and add Sergeij Alejnikov when they played for the club around the same ammount of times. Also Paul Arnold Walty is not a notable former player at all set out by the standard, he played four times for one season and has achieved no notabliity outside of that at all.


 * Also for example with Lucidio Sentimenti and Vittorio Sentimenti... there is no need to add the ugly (IVº) and (IIIº) things after their full names, because they are only used to differentiate the players when just giving the surname, its not essential. - The Daddy 02:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I know what the "I" and the "II" means. I've worked on the Sentimenti family football articles. But it is not needed when the full name of the player is given, it is only for when just a surname is given by itself that it is needed to help differentiate.

For example if the Cannavaro brothers played for the same team today, they would have "F. Cannavaro" and "P. Cannavaro" on their shirts, but when their full name (first and second) is given then no further information needs to be provided to help differentiate. Its the same situation with the "I" and "II".

Domenico Donna could maybe pass notability, but I don't see why Walty or Alejnikov should... its not as if Walty was a founding player. If every player that was ever part of a Juventus squad which won a trophy was added to the list then it would be endless. - The Daddy 02:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Juventus Ultras
The article has some part which need to be sourced, as they are potentially non-neutrals (e.g., claims of "most important ultras group" among the Juve fans), in any case I marked them all. Some copyedit is necessary, as it is clear the article was not written by a native English speaker ("knowned" instead of "known" is probably the most impressive example). --Angelo 20:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

grammatics
Hello, please note that this sentence is not grammatically correct in the English languages, "..sixth in the world with the most international titles officially recognized...". The with part in bold is incorrect wording because it makes this sound like Juventus have the most international titles, period. I think the other wording which I put in makes it clearer, more correct and better. Thanks - Meddi (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Also Torino is never part of the clubs name and the club never uses that. - Meddi (talk) 01:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

International Federation of Football History & Statistics
On the Juventus page this is pointless and not a balanced overview of the club's history. First of all its not official, second of all it does not give anymore valuable information than is already given. It is showed in the opening ...

All-time: Juventus has the 6th most international titles, making them over a weighted period of history, currently 6th all-time.

IFFHS: this only shows stats from 1991 to present, the stats are not complete so what is the point in using them, when it is already asserted earlier in the opening that Juventus are historically one of the most successful clubs in the entire world.

IFFHS is recentist as it does not cover the whole history and so not relevent in a historic balanced overview of the club, especially for an introduction about the club. I hope you can see this way. - Meddi (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Uefa Cup
Hi Dante. Look, I don´t say that Rsssf.com is above the Uefa´s source. I only say that in comparison to the Fadiga´s sources, the Rsssf one is completely superior to thouse not serious sources. It´s obvious that i´m agree with you that only the UEFA´s source must be the first one in this discussion, and we are agree in the fact of separate Uefa Cup with Fairs Cup.

Your regards, --Ultracanalla (talk) 00:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * This doesn't bode well for your case Ultracanela, soliciting other editors in Spanish because you can't behave on the English wikipedia properly. MickMacNee (talk) 00:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of Juventus F.C.
As you appear to be a significant contributor to this article, I wanted to be certain you were aware that Juventus F.C. has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Malleus Fatuorum 19:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Boca Juniors
Hi Dante, I just saw that you moved the Boca Juniors article to Club Atlético Boca Juniors, and I was wondering if you cared to read the discussion page of the article before you decided to move it?. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 21:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * My understanding is that it did lead to a consensus, and the article was moved from Club Atlético Boca Juniors to Boca Juniors, also is my believe that if a previous moved was discuss, this moved should had been discuss also. Regards--Bocafan76 (talk) 21:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

International club competition records
Alright, I sent the administrator Todd the request to add in the table. By the way, aren't you the dude with the youtube channel? --MicroX (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

He didn't answer me or do anything. I'll try again. --MicroX (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Latin Cup
http://es.fifa.com/worldfootball/clubfootball/news/newsid=1012311.html

This resolves all your doubts. As you can read in Spanish; FIFA considers that Di Stefano scored 307 official goals in Real Madrid, TWO OF THEM in Latin Cup. There's no doubt, FIFA official site considers Latin Cup an official competition as it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cid Campeador3 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Please assume good faith and do not use misleading edit summaries
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article International Federation of Football History & Statistics has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on International Federation of Football History & Statistics. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 174.30.222.137 (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IFFHS continental Clubs of the 20th Century


The article IFFHS continental Clubs of the 20th Century has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. Listcruft. Copyright.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArglebargleIV (talk) 18:56, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of world club champions in association football


The article List of world club champions in association football has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * See here for reference. The Intercontinental Cup was clearly not a world championship. This has come from numerous times by FIFA and they gave their reasons (very valid ones at that). For example, the Afro-Asian Championship could also claimed to be a world championship just for having two confederations coming together. Seeing the above information, and the little relevance in having this, I propose this list be deleted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. God Football (talk) 21:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of world club champions in association football
Hello Dante, as you are the creator of the List of world club champions in association football I thought I'd notify you of this discussion at User:GiantSnowman's talk page about suspicious activity at the above deletion discussion. Regards &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JFC2


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on JFC2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Personal attacks against you
Please let me know if User:Soccer historian continues to comment about you that way, on any page. I've given them a final warning. Also, I don't believe I've seen similar comments from User:God Football but if I'm wrong and you've had to put up with that from him too, let me know. --Floquenbeam (talk) 05:03, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

TemplateData is here
Hey Dantetheperuvian

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Juventus channel2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Juventus channel2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586085149 your edit] to Juventus F.C. in European football may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Juventus Football Club, commonly referred to as Juventus  and colloquially as Juve (pronounced ), is a professional [[association football]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586116511 your edit] to Juventus F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Juventus Football Club S.p.A. (ise: IT0000336518 JUVE) from Latin The name "Juventus" is a literal license in [[Piedmontese language]

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

September 2014
Your recent editing history at Intercontinental Cup (football) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 19:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Intercontinental Cup (football). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 19:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Intercontinental Cup (football)
Why not start a thread and work it out there? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

I started it: Talk:Intercontinental Cup (football). Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Runner-up honours
These are perfectly acceptable, please do not remove them from club or player articles again. GiantSnowman 20:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yep, please see WikiProject Football/Clubs where it states that "Achievements of the club including wins and second places." GiantSnowman 20:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Intertoto
Greetings,

I saw the two changes you did for Atlético and Deportivo for 2007 and 2008 respectively. Although you are right, they were not outright champions of UIC those two years, there was actually none. They were regional competitions and each Atlético and Deportivo each became the champions for their respective regions, earning this way each a spot in the UEFA Championship. Later, based on averages, an "titular" champions was calculated. Yet, from 2006 to 2008, those 3 years, there were 11 Regional UIC champions each, Atlético and Deportivo being two of the 33 Regional champions. Thanks for your regard on this matter.--Coquidragon (talk) 04:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * No, I'm not wrong. Read the articles for the 2007 and 2008 UIC tournaments on this wiki, which are well documented, or even the general Intertoto article. If you need external reference, here is the link to UIC at UEFA.com. Please look at the dropdown box for Previous seasons winners. You'll see both Atlético and Deportivo. Here is the Link. You say that "UEFA made it clear in its rules for the last 3 editions who was proclaimed champion." Yes, the last three seasons of UIC had 11 champions/winners each. Of the 11 teams, that team which progressed the further in the UEFA championship was declared a posteriori the outright winner, but only titular champion. It is well documented. My "regional" label was misused, since they were the winners of the third round of the tournament. I apologize for the misunderstanding.--Coquidragon (talk) 10:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * With your last message, I see where are you coming from. You only count the team that got the trophy. Yes, they are the champions. What I am trying to communicate is that although there was one outright champion (per discussed rules), there were 11 winners. Here I leave you the profile for Atlético de Madrid at UEFA.com. Although they don't have the trophy for 2007, please see how in the list of honours, it does list UIC 2007. They were winners of UIC. Thanks for your consideration on this matter.--Coquidragon (talk) 00:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * (I've copied our exchange on the talk for the page in question for historical purposes. We can continue the exchange there.)--Coquidragon (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

International honours
I don't see the point of removing international runners-up when they are more than the wins. SLBedit (talk) 23:33, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Football records in Spain
A pro-barca vandal User:Suitcivil (proven by his edit history) is desparately trying to increase barcelonas trophy tally by including cups like fairs cup and some unknown copa argentina. I noticed your were involved in this a long time ago. As of now, I have reverted it back to the proper consensus version. Please take a look time to time to stop these vandals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SupernovaeIA (talk • contribs) 15:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Football records in spain
Hi again, have you checked the article yet? It has already been vandalized and no one has edited it back to the consensus version. ICFC has been included just to raise barca's records. Please change and remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:C68B:12E0:D942:AC6E:343C:CEEC (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Juve titles
Are you including the one Serie B title, or is that not counted? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 20:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

kicker Sportmagazin club ranking
Kinda uncomfortable to ask for this at Wikipedia, but are you able to show the source of Kicker's all-time club ranking that you mentioned while reverting my edit? Thanks Виктор Не Вацко (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2017 (UTC+2)

BRD
I just want to make sure you are both aware of the WP:BRD cycle.

Thank you.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I urge you to use the sources you stated at the Juve talk page in conjunction with what the other user wrote in order to balance both sides. The POV template is not needed if this info is there. I think they have points that this controversy did occur so it could be talked about, but you seem to know the facts better and understand Italian better than me. Please add this info. Thank you. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * That ought to be a matter for the article talk pages. Stating that here excludes others who watch the article.Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I've already stated my opinion there and WT:FOOTY. This was a direct message to Dante as he was the one who unnecessarily added POV templates to the articles. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 00:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Please avoid revert wars. Use the talk pages. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

BRD
Please agree at FOOTY.

Thank you.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Juventus F.C. Women


A tag has been placed on Category:Juventus F.C. Women requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Juventus F.C. Women managers


A tag has been placed on Category:Juventus F.C. Women managers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real Madrid CF, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Honorific title. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Grenoble
 * added a link pointing to Capital of the Alps
 * Turin
 * added a link pointing to Capital of the Alps

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grenoble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital of the Alps.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 9 January 2022 (UTC)