User talk:Dantman

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DBGT_Logo.svg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DBGT_Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 22:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey Dantman
I was curious to see if you edited recently and today you apparently have. Are you available to comment? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I assumed you were a sysop here too but, after looking at your user page, it appears that you are not. Take a look at what I have to deal with, , , , , , the same edits as Prince Zarbon, my suspicions were correct all along, it is Recoome's doing (yes the same Recoome from DB wiki). This is where I need you to comment, Recoome uses a new ip every to troll my talk page, what can be done: a block range, semi-protection of my talk page, or something else? Whatever the case, as long as this vandal stays away from me I'll be content. Your thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try WP:AN/I for further suggestions if he does it once more. He may be watching this conversation though, so he would know by now that this is his chance to stop. Thanks Dantman. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:Soul Eater
Sorry, not really interested in contributing to a wiki. And do note that the "same thing happening to Soul Eater" is a good thing. When List of Soul Eater characters is longer than List of Naruto characters despite running for ~250 less chapters and having maybe an eighth of the character cast, you know something is wrong. In any case, Wikipedia's level of coverage of fictional subjects only extends to those that pass our notability guideline, as I'm sure you're well aware of. Your coverage on wikis are unlimited, and I wish you only the best of luck on your endeavors, but I'm quite happy here, thanks. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 10:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)