User talk:Danward

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Robdurbar 22:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Flowing glass
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. This information is already present in Glass. Please research your topic before creating a new article. You may find that another editor has already had the same idea, saving you time and effort.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   23:03, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Agh! I was trying to move that information out of Glass. Copying the information was the very idea.  I was doing it pursuant to a suggestion made by another user that (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Glass#But_.2Ais.2A_glass_a_liquid.3F_Don.27t_ask_wikipedia_apparently....) that the section on 'glass as a liquid' be spun off as a seperate article, following the Summary Style principle.  Go on then: enlighten me on the procedure for carrying off that kind of maneouvre.  --Danward 23:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Look - can I have my article back and some sort of protection against this happening again. Pursuant to a suggestion made by a user on the Talk:Glass page that the section on 'glass as a liquid' was getting too long and should be spun off as a seperate article (on the Summary Style principle) I was trying to move that information into a seperate article. Otherwise - enlighten me on an appropriate procedure for going about doing what I was trying to achieve before it was all deleted. --Danward 15:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, I have moved the content to User:Danward/Sandbox, where you can edit without intervention. Regards,  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   15:54, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

"Doctrine of equity"
Fine by me, I never added that statement to begin with. The first paragraph of Equity (law) pretty much sums up your point.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 09:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)