User talk:DanyloPushkar

Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings,

It seems you have lately edited some article which is linked/ connected to Black sea article. Please do have a look at Talk:Black Sea and help expand Black Sea.

Also requesting to visit Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları, an article is about Ottoman times female slavery with a special focus on the state of non-elite common women slavery in those times; and help expand the same if you find yourself interested in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

EDIT WARRING NOTICE
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.(KIENGIR (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC))

Discretionary sanctions notice

 * You are on a trajectory which usually ends up with a swift block--Ymblanter (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I am reverting pretty much all of your edits. Please discuss at talk pages.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think he listened to your advice. Mellk (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this person is not catching on to the whole "discuss" thing. This is supplemented by the use of such language in edit summaries as "There is nothing to discuss" and "indisputable". DanyloPushkar, "Because I say so" doesn't work here. Largoplazo (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, apparently the user is only here to revert and not to make any useful contribution. They need to be blocked indef but unfortunately I can not be the one to block them. Could somebody please open an ANI topic? --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Haydamak, you may be blocked from editing. Largoplazo (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * One of your edit summaries says your edit was in line with Wikipedia standards--while you were breaking those standards be reintroducing material that had just been contested, violating the standards regarding arguing in articles and supplying sources. Do not appeal to "Wikipedia standards" when you don't know what they are. Largoplazo (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop adding information without references in numerous pages. Please read our policies WP:CITE and WP:RS. If you continue doing so despite warnings, you will be blocked from editing. Lembit Staan (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents at your service. Please reply there.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —valereee (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)