User talk:Danyoung

Hi, , and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * To post an image try Image tutorial, but remember to look out for copyright violations
 * Stay away from common mistakes
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or on my user talk page
 * Explore, be bold, and, most importantly, have fun!
 * And so nice to see that you have joined Babel

Good luck! Renata3 20:34, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Nice work on the theater termsAce Diamond 16:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Theatre Welcome
Thank you for becoming a member of WikiProject Theatre! With your hard work we hope to build a comprehensive compendium of theatrical knowledge here on Wikipedia. Since its founding in May of this year, not much has happened here so I have started a discussion on the project’s talk page to arouse some interest and discussion. There is also an updated list of items needing attention on the main project page. If you know of or happen to come across a theatre related article needing attention, feel free to post it on the page. Again, thanks for joining and I look forward to working with you! *Exeunt* Ganymead 19:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Bremen
It was in the Bremen that most people are referring to when they say "Bremen": the city in Germany. -Branddobbe 21:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Theatre
Thanks for your response on the talk page. It's nice to know that someone is paying attention. I have recently started an article assessment for Theatre (Assessment page). My concentration has really been more in the creative side of theatre (my own training is mostly in that as well) so there is a lack of work on the technical side of theatre. I'll add a list of technical theatre articles to the assessment page. Please take a look and help out if you are so inclined! Thanks! *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 19:53, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm also planning to re-design the layout for the project page. It's rather dull right now and after checking out the page for the French WikiProject Theatre, I think we need a change. Leave it to the French to always be aesthetically pleasing! *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 20:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yup, just like the French! A new project page would be cool, though. I'll check out the article assessment page whenever I have some spare time - danyoung - 21:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey there! You may want to stop by the project and check out the new layout. It's snazzier than the French page, at least in my unbiased opinion. Please let me know what you think! *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 08:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:LondonStreetsMark.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:LondoonStreetsMark.jpg. The copy called Image:LondoonStreetsMark.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LondonStreetsMark.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LondonStreetsMark.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:LondonStreetsMark.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LondonStreetsMark.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Theatre assessment

 * Hi Dan, thanks for your comments on my talk page. I have given myself the goal of trying to assess 10 articles a day, 5 in the AM and 5 in the PM.  At that rate the backlog could be gone by the end of Jan.  Your help is very welcome, as time permits.  There are about 300 articles to be assessed.  Then there are some that are assessed already for quality, but not for importance, or the other way around.  But, one thing at a time.  One day at a time and we can do great things!  (Henceforth I will leave any UK related articles alone, maybe you have more to say about them).  Cheers. --Mdukas (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks for all of your Theatre article assessments! that is great!  between us we are really working it down, thanks! --Mdukas (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks again Dan for all of your theatre assessment work. We seem to be making great progress! --Mdukas (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * wow, a Barnstar! I feel highly flattered. There's still a long way to go though .. ! - danyoung - 18:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Nineteen;twentynine
Hi Dan, Back when I closed the AfD there were issues with notability and reliable secondary sources. It looks like the newer version includes a couple of outside sources and the company probably (and just barely) meets WP:N now. Feel free to tag it. Cheers--DO11.10 (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks - danyoung - 21:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)