User talk:Dapsv~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Jeff3000 22:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

link to defender
Hello, when you want to link to the article about a defender, please do not link to defender, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as defender (football) by writing out defender Regards, -- Jeff3000 22:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Do not use club badges in player articles
Hi Dapsv, I assume you didn't know not to, but it is forbidden to use copyrighted images, like club badges, in articles that are not about what they describe. For example using the Liverpool F.C. badge on the Liverpool F.C. article is fine. Using the badge on the Premier League article is not. Using the badges on player articles is also not allowed. Please don't add anymore, it's a real pain to remove them again.

If you could start removing them yourself it'd be appreciated.

cheers,

aLii 13:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

WP Munich invitation
 Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?
 * You can join a Task Force.
 * You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
 * You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
 * You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
 * You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
 * You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
 * You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
 * You can help reference articles.
 * Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
 * You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

 Kingjeff 16:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Flags in infoboxes
Please don't add any more adding flags to infoboxes. The practice is frowned upon as per WP:FLAGS. We have been removing them from discussions in Wikiproject Football. If you want to diswcuss the issue, feel free to do it in Talk:Wikiproject Football. Alexf (Talk/Contribs) 12:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. - Dudesleeper Talk  16:32, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Editing tests
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Sebisthlm (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Darwinek (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Darwinek (talk) 19:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!
Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 23:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Manchester United F.C. season 2009–10
First of all, at the end of United's game against Sunderland, they were in 1st place. Second, upcoming fixtures in any competition organised by the Premier League, Football League, Scottish Premier League or Scottish Football League are copyrighted and must not be displayed in our articles. Therefore, I have removed the upcoming fixtures you added to the Man Utd 2009–10 article. – PeeJay 09:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

World Heritage Infoboxes
Hi. As another editor pointed out above, you really should be using edit summaries to explain your changes. I reverted a change you made to the Giant's Causeway article as I could see no valid reason for blanking the infobox. Can you explain why you removed it? Guliolopez (talk) 10:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Live scores
Wikipedia is not a news source. Please do not add live scores to articles pertaining to sporting events. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:02, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Football League One
Can you stop removing the Q from the tables, please? With no edit summaries and the rather persistent nature of it, it's starting to look bad. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Republic of Ireland national football team 2010s results worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Match report events
Hi, I see you moved Kolo's yellow card booking in the Sunderland game onto a separate line from Micah's booking. Since I was the person that combined them on the same line, you need to know that that was not an oversight on my part. The two bookings are for the same event ... the awarding of the penalty for Micah's foul on Bent. Richards got his card for committing the foul while Touré got his for protesting the penalty award. I see no problem with combining icons on the same line with the same timings when they refer to what is essentially the same event (such as a goal scorer that also gets booked for taking his shirt off while celebrating the goal). I combined the events only to save a line in the match summary since City had quite a few more reported events in its column than Sunderland had in its corresponding column ... if the double-booking had been for Sunderland I would probably have left the related events displayed one per line.

I don't feel particularly strongly about this issue either way, but others may do because there are some editors of the season article that have already stated that they feel that the sub and carding info. belongs only in the referenced match report. Consequently, I think you probably should raise the topic on the season article's Talk Page and solicit other opinions before going ahead with any other edits along the same lines. We are in new territory here with these new collapsible match reports and therefore some ground rules need to be established for what is and what is not considered good style, or wastes too much space, etc. This would be as good an issue as any to start the ball rolling. Also, if you want to put some time in on this area of the article there are still quite a few pre-season games still waiting to have their match events added rather than your spending your time tinkering around with what is already in pretty good shape. Mancini&#39;s Lasagne invite to Harry Talk 19:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I believe that the match events should be listed in a chronological time-flow manner, and I know that I am not alone in this view. Consequently, all of Ade's 3 goals can all be combined together under a single icon on the same line because there were no carding or substitution events interspersed between them.  But that is a fairly rare situation.  For instance, if City's first substitution had occurred before his third goal then the first two goals would have had to be separated from the third one, with that substitution shown in between, and so on.  That is the situation that applies to the two Tévez goals that you combined, which is why I reverted them.


 * As I stated above, we are somewhat in new territory this season with the collapsible match reports, and the match events do not necessarily have to be listed in a time-flow manner if that is what the majority of editors desire. For instance, all the events for each game could be listed together by type ... first the goals (if any), then the cards (if any), then any substitutions.  But whatever style is agreed upon it has to be done consistently across all the match report collapsibles.  Right now, all of the match reports completed to date have been executed in the time-flow manner, and the edit you just did contradicts that style without conforming to any other style.  That doesn't mean that the current style is set in concrete, nevertheless it does now represent an established status quo.


 * If you wish to change that status quo you will need to raise this topic on the season article Talk Page and ballot the opinions of other editors to see what they think - as I suggested to you in my first message above (to which you did not even have the courtesy to respond). Making random changes to what has already been done is not the way to go about effecting such a change of mind set.  There is arguably no obvious "best" style in this particular situation - meaning that a total consensus on a preferable style may never be possible - but whatever style that is adopted has to be consistent throughout the article.  Otherwise we are just going to crawl all over each other as editors and the article will look like the product of a giant free-for-all.


 * Additionally, there may be some editors that feel there should be a ball icon for every goal that is scored, since each carding and substitution event also has its own icon. Which is why I entered Ade's hat trick the way that I did.  Once again, this is just a question of style.  As is which events can be combined on the same line versus which events must be entered on a new line (the subject of my first message above).  There are no 100% correct answers to any of these issues, but IMO a less than perfect style that is consistently adhered to is much preferable to a free-for-all SNAFU.  We all need to be singing from the same sheet here.  Mancini&#39;s Lasagne invite to Harry  Talk 19:58, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

2010–11 Ajax Amsterdam season
Thanks for keeping 2010–11 Ajax Amsterdam season up to date. Great job! JACO PLANE  &bull; 2010-12-14 09:18

Hamburger SV seasons
Would you like to start working on more Hamburger SV seasons? I would like to get all of theri Bundesliga seasons completed. Kingjeff (talk) 06:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Van Persie
You restored an error to 2010–11 UEFA Champions League knockout phase by changing "Van Persie" to "van Persie". Dutch capitalization rules indicate that family names with the "van", when they stand alone, are to be capitalized but not when they are part of the full name. That means "Robin van Persie" is correct and "Van Persie" is correct while "van Persie" is not. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

2011–12 SV Werder Bremen season
I noticed that you helped work on the 2010–11 SV Werder Bremen season article. Would you be able to help with 2011–12 SV Werder Bremen season article? Kingjeff (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Norwich City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Oliver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Aston Villa F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Chelsea F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Fulham F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Sevilla FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Lopez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Borussia Dortmund season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naldo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

UEFA elite stadium
Hi mate, just so you know, UEFA hasn't used the "five-star" system for rating stadiums in several years. Can you please undo all the changes you're making? Cheers. – PeeJay 19:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga table
Template:2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kingjeff (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Manchester United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Javier Hernández (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dapsv. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dapsv~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)