User talk:Dargaud

==Fady== A tag has been placed on Fady, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:51, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Ice core future plans
Hi -- I saw this edit, and was wondering where you got that information from. Currently that section is cited to IPICS, so I looked in the technical challenges white paper], and didn't see anything there. Is there another source? Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi -- Not sure if this is the way to respond. Indeed it's not on the IPICS paper, but it came to mind when I read the list. It's currently being developed and tested by french glaciologists around Dome C. It's not my main field and I don't have direct contact with them anymore. See SubGlacior here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275062196_The_SUBGLACIOR_drilling_probe_concept_and_design and also the Watson NASA concept for Mars and Europa.
 * Yes, this is a good place to reply. I think I'm going to remove it from that article and put something based on that paper into the ice drilling article, which seems like it might be a better fit.  Thanks for the reference! Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 22:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem, do as you think is best, I usually only do anonymous minor edits.