User talk:DarinaeManzani

March 2019
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Isabelle Adjani seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC) ""Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we" make sure to put in place unjustified and subjective deletion of fully referenced sub-section regarding the subject's political views we don't want to be read about despite it having generated major controversy nationwide for weeks and having been fully covered in almost ALL MAJOR NEWS OUTLETS in France. Is that what you actually meant? "Your recent edit to Isabelle Adjani seemed less than neutral": what monstrous hypocrisy, the edit your are talking about is fully referenced and is a DIRECT QUOTE FROM AN INTERVIEW RECORDED LIVE while broastcoast on one of France's 3 leading radio stations. Moreover, these are not selected passages. This is her entire statement without ANY added or removed elements hence the length! The few lines of contextualization are perfectly neutral and were published as they are written by almost ALL OF FRANCE's LEADING NEWS OUTLETS. YOU DEFORMED FACTS by REWRITING THE QUOTE rendering it factually false stating "During the interview she expressed her vaccine hesitancy and opposition to mandatory vaccination" which is not what she said and is FAR from being the only argument of her speech. Moreover, YOU justified your 2nd deletion of this sub-section writing "This is not an anti-vaccine soapbox" which shows your bias in not wanting the actress' anti-vaccine public claims to be seen by Wikipedia's readers which is censorship. Moreover, one could question if you are not, as a contributor, in direct link with the multinational pharmaceutical companies or the politians she is speaking out against as you so badly want to delete this information from the article. Besides, the entirety of her allocution is very important as it informs on many other elements such as the actress revealing for the first time ever that she commited on offense against the Law by faking medical certificates and not vaccinating her own children. Who are you to delete all these elements and then daring calling out contributors for "lack of neutrality" when you are actually the one who does lack it? You further REMOVED some of the actress' stage credits I added because they are not referenced although they are on many of the 54 foreign language versions of this wikipedia article and these sources are extremely easy to find anyway, but I guess that for this 2nd edit you don't even speak the language of the topic in question neither to verify it yourself. You did not even CHECK the veracity of the few credits before DELETING. You were so mad I reverted your biased deletion that you even re-sized the images I very slightly aggrandized and that shows how biased you are in only allowing edits which fit YOUR PERSONAL TASTE. I am sorry but I will not bow down to your censorship. Thank you very much for your understanding.--DarinaeManzani (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)