User talk:Darius Musteikis

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

I not started edit war.
Why revert my changes? Regarding the topic, It is many times stated by historians, that there is no clear evidence, that A. Ramanauskas - Vanagas could participate in the Holocaust. Some sources attempted to tight another group of the self-protecting squad to Vanagas group. In Lithuania, in the year 1941, many different military groups were, not all of them were involved in the Holocaust.

Regarding the blackmail campaign against Vanagas
If you have time there is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Adolfas_Ramanauskas#Controversy to write your arguments. -- Ke an (talk)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!