User talk:DarjeelingTea/Archive 4

Proposed collaboration on a close
I have noticed you do an excellent job of closing old discussions on WP:ANRFC. I have seen Talk:United_States_Senate_election_in_South_Dakota,_2016 listed for long time and was working on a close. After investigating, I see that it will have to be a difficult one, especially since the candidate is involved directly in the debate. This is probably why it has lingered. I think it needs an endorsed or multi-editor close, so the editor in question does not perceive it as one opinion, and I would like you to assist me. If I write up a proposed close and email it to you, would you then endorse it once posted? If this works for you, let me know and we can work out some process. I will probably also contact one or two other experienced closers with the same request. Thanks. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Eggishorn - thanks so much for your kind words and I think you're correct that it's past time it be closed. Also, a multi-editor close would be a great idea. Unfortunately, I was a participant in that RfC so it would be inappropriate for me to be one of those editors. If I can help in any other way, however, please do not hesitate to let me know. DarjeelingTea (talk) 16:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your encouragement. I understand and appreciate your concerns, and I think they are well-placed.  This has already been to ANI once, as I'm sure you know, so I certainly don't want to provide an excuse to bring it back there.  Thanks again.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

National Geographic Bee
Thank you for reviewing the National Geographic Bee articles. LuckyWiki26 (talk) 18:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for writing them, LuckyWiki26! DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for assessing this RfC in detail and explaining the next steps. I lost interest in the discussion as few other editors were participating... I wonder how the next discussion will play out! Regards, — Sunnya343&#9992; (háblame • my work) 04:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, Sunnya343&#9992;! Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. DarjeelingTea (talk) 05:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Warren Gulley
Hello! Your submission of Warren Gulley at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Jupitus Smart  10:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC).

DYK for The Final Days (Clinton film)
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Foreign military units at the state funeral of John Kennedy
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Foreign military units at the state funeral of John Kennedy
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, much, ComputerJA! DarjeelingTea (talk) 05:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, LuckyWiki26! DarjeelingTea (talk) 02:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Re-creation of Ekopedia article (after its deletion)
Hello, I believe the Ekopedia article was deleted because Ekopedia went off line ? is it OK to recreate it now that it's back online again (at least for the french project which was the biggest project anyway) ? Thanks for your help ! -- Pierro78 (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello, somebody has deleted the article ... I could have added links (see http://www.appropedia.org/Ekopedia ) If I had time ... is it possible to recreate the article ? Thanks --Pierro78 (talk) 16:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

The Final Days (Clinton film)
Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Final Days has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with your GA review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Twofingered Typist - as always, thank you very much for your superior and tireless copyediting! DarjeelingTea (talk) 05:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

N3 IMSA GTP PAGE DELETION
Why was this page nominated for deletion? MacMerc17 (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * because it didn't belong, MacMerc17 DarjeelingTea (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you please elaborate, sir? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacMerc17 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No, sorry. DarjeelingTea (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not a sufficient answer, DarjeelingTea. I did not set out to offend anybody creating this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacMerc17 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I've read the rules concerning content. I understand the need to be truthful in all articles presented, especially knowing so many students use this platform for research. My apologies.
 * No prob. DarjeelingTea (talk) 02:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Strategic Response Group
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of White House to Treasury Building tunnel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article White House to Treasury Building tunnel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Swpb -- Swpb (talk) 17:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Swpb - thanks very much for the thorough review. I'll begin working on the edits you outlined and ping you when they're done. DarjeelingTea (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of America's 60 Families
The article America's 60 Families you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:America's 60 Families for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of å‡°å…°æ—¶ç½— -- å‡°å…°æ—¶ç½— (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Royal McLog
Hello DarjeelingTea. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Royal McLog, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Old Bob
Hello! Your submission of Old Bob at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for White House to Treasury Building tunnel
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi DarjeelingTea. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ADarjeelingTea enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  03:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.