User talk:DarkAudit/Archives/2008/February

Patricia Kopta
DarkAudit, I'm going to try not get angry or take it personally that you nominated this article for deletion, but you'll have to forgive me - I'm pretty riled up about it. I think that putting the single-source tag on it would have been FAR more appropriate a move. This allows the article to stay, but indicates that more sources are needed. To simply delete the entire article makes no sense. I'm not sure how old you are, but if you were at any Pirates or Steelers games in the 1980s or 1990s, or any event held in downtown Pittsburgh at that time, you would have seen this woman - people remember her as a part of Pittsburgh history. NickBurns (talk) 15:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I tried to look up more sources on her from here, but all that came back were the Wikipedia article and the YouTube videos. That single source and the only local notability was what prompted me to but the article up for AfD. I've made my case for why I think it should go. It's up to the community to decide if the article meets the standards. Some have agreed with me, others haven't. If consensus moves towards keep, then it's kept. Just because it's in AfD doesn't mean the article's unsalvageable. I've been involved in more than one AfD discussion where the article evolved over the discussion period into something much different, to the point where the nomination was withdrawn. DarkAudit (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, you won. Congratulations. Clearly, being a journalist AND living in Pittsburgh for 30+ years still doesn't make me a good judge of notability. I hope you appreciate your victory. Since my work is no longer valued here, I see no reason to continue to make contributions. NickBurns (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not my fault the article didn't meet the guidelines in WP:BIO. That's the standard people use around here. It's also not my fault that there wasn't much in the way of discussion in the AfD or much work on the article. My last comment sat there for days with no further response. DarkAudit (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bonanzabunny.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Bonanzabunny.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bushy hare.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Bushy hare.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gillcloseup.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gillcloseup.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Staine
An editor has nominated Staine, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

FICTWARN and non-television invocations
My understanding is that FICTWARN applies to all fictional characters, but you may wish to request clarification from the Arbitration Committee. --Eastmain (talk) 15:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Adil shamoo
I reverted this article back to the version prior to my stub edit. I was not paying attention to the tags. My bad. Cheers  Gtstricky Talk or C 21:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That will give the other editor space to work while the admins sort out the rest. Thanks. DarkAudit (talk) 21:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)