User talk:DarkAudit/Archives/2010/October

Whooping
Hi Brian,

When nominating a redirect for deletion, it is important to start the discussion on the "Redirects for discussion" page so that editors can add their input as to whether or not the redirect should be deleted. I would be interested in participating in the discussion of the Whooping redirect if you still believe it to be worthy of deletion.

Neelix (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I used Twinkle, and the nomination procedures apparently never completed properly, and I had to be at work before I could clean it up. CNN ran a feature on "whooping" as a tradition of African-American churches, and although there is no article on that at present, it's enough of a difference to make a disambig page more reasonable than the redirect to the A&M page. DarkAudit (talk) 03:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Brian,


 * No worries. Why not just move the redirect to Whooping (A&M) and expand the resulting redirect at Whooping to an article on the African-American tradition?


 * Neelix (talk) 12:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)