User talk:DarkChaos27

Your spam whitelist request
Thank you for making a request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. I am sorry that it has taken this amount of time to attend to your request. Please be advised that we have been unable to close your request based on the information supplied. Please visit the whitelist request page and search for your name or the site you requested where you will see details of what additional information is required. Please note that replies here or on my talk page will not be taken into account. Please also note that if no information is received within two weeks from now, your request may be treated as withdrawn. Stifle (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon Ausman


The article Jon Ausman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This BLP article seems to have been created primarily as an excuse to list a lot of controversies about the article's subject. Jon Ausman also doesn't appear to be notable, just some mentions in local newspapers.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rotten regard 01:04, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jon Ausman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jon Ausman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jon Ausman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rotten regard 01:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Jon Ausman

 * Why are you two punks battling? Its disruptive.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:22, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The page was created by me, and of course I am open to peopled editing. The editor in question is however the person the article is about, and they are simply posting a list of info without citation, I am merely reversing those uncited edits by the subject themselves.  DarkChaos27 (talk)
 * Is it really shocking he would do that when you are crafting the article into a hit piece? Both of you should know better.--Milowent • hasspoken  13:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)