User talk:Dark Silver Crow

Consensus
DOwenWilliams (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Good call
with this merge. I had thought about doing that long ago. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm working on clearing out old merges, so that's how I came across it. Sadly there wasn't that much I could salvage from the page. -- D ark C row Caw 00:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I'm so glad to see you stopped by! We'd love to see you at the Teahouse any time you have a question or feel like answering someone else's. heather walls (talk) 06:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
On the contrary, your contributions have been constructive. Continue the excellent contributions.

SwisterTwister  talk  19:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * Have some FUN. Click on FUN to go to Pluma's Fun Stuff assignment.  You may learn some things you've seen but didn't know how to do.  If you type in ✅ when you edit a talk page, it turns into ✅  Might come in handy.  Oh, and by the way, mergers are important and deserving of

Doryanthes and Doryanthaceae
Hi, you were absolutely right to merge these two articles, which has been waiting to be done since 2010 it seems. However, the policy of WikiProject Plants is to use the genus as the main article when there is a single genus in a family. See point (3) at WP:PLANTS and, as just one example, Daphniphyllum. So I undid your merger, but would encourage you to do it the other way round, i.e. merge the content of Doryanthaceae into Doryanthes. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh! Thanks. I should've checked there first before doing the merge. I'll be sure to reverse next time. -- D ark C row Caw 00:13, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Merge of content from I'm not lovin' it
Can you point me to any discussion of your merge of content from I'm not lovin' it to the article Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, as I can't find any. I think that the content justifiably stands on its own, and while I can envision a case for a merge I don't see that it has been made, discussed and that consensus was to merge the content. Alansohn (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * There wasn't any discussion; there was a two-year old merge tag on the "I'm not lovin' it" article, with no objection at either Talk:I'm not lovin' it nor at Talk:Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Based on that and reviewing the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine content which was the same as half of the I'm not lovin' it article, I merely merged the few paragraphs that were not present. I maintain no personal connection to the subject matter and was just acting to clean up the merge backlog so if you feel it's better suited on its own, I will not object to a revert of my edits, as long as the old (2010) merge tag is not returned. -- D ark C row Caw 19:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Merger of simming and Play-by-post_role-playing_game
Hey, I'm about ready to do the merger of these two articles. I was hoping you could look it over or let me know if I'm doing anything wrong. A lot of the content of simming is original research and impossible to verify, or doesn't have value so I'm not including it in the merger. --Frugen (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure! I can give it a look over. I came to the same conclusion with regards to the Simming article, so I would not be surprised if you're able to cut it down by a fair bit. -- D ark C row Caw 15:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, merger is done. I hope it's much better than before! Please let me know how it looks. --Frugen (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me. The only thing I see missing (although, also not sourced) is that the Simming article mentions software associated with Simming; Nova by Anodyne Productions.  I guess if there is some sort of source/more info on this, a section on Play-by-post software would be be beneficial, so its not mandatory for the merge at the moment.  Outside that, looks alright.  Thanks for your help! -- D ark C row Caw 18:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking it over. I looked into anodyne as the article was the first I'd heard of it, but their website offers extremely little information and I couldn't find anything on it anywhere else. I don't get the impression it's better known than standard forum software packages like php or vbulletin. Most simmers use those common public products and modify them to their needs. There are some lists of forum software but I think just mentioning it broadly is enough. My next step is to read a book to find some actual sources for the content.--Frugen (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

If you need help editing,
 * Check out the tutorial.
 * Wanting to create an article? Use the article wizard.
 * See the manual.

TOW talk  16:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Vuelta Mexico Telmex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Carlos Lopez and Ouch


 * Paul Livingston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Blah Blah Blah

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. When you recently edited Annonaceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. When you recently edited John, I'm Only Dancing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Young Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
Hi. When you recently edited Jamie Shovlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Misdirection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Datte Anata Wa Anata Da Kara


The article Datte Anata Wa Anata Da Kara has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Help Akshardham Environment Violation Section
Hello,

If you have time would you please take a look at this article: and this discussion  and provide your input. There is a cited content dispute I am having and I feel you can help with some clarification for this topic.

Thank you

Swamiblue (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Redirect
What is the problem with a short article "The Red House Report" giving a link to the article Adam LeBor ? The French Wikipedia has two distinct articles, thus it would be good if the article "The Red House Report" in the French Wikipedia had a link to an article in the English Wikipedia. What's the downside? Marvoir (talk) 11:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

I haven't been active on Wikipedia in seven years with no plans to return. With respect to whichever article you have linked please proceed with whatever action you believe is the best. Whatever I did seven+ years ago may no longer be relevant. Most of my edits were trying to clean up old tagged articles anyway. In short, I have no opinion on this, proceed with what works best for the French and English wikis. Thanks. D ark C row Caw 12:47, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I had misunderstppd the page The Red House Report: Revision history. Marvoir (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Cabaret (Das Ich album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cabaret (Das Ich album), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Cabaret (Das Ich album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)