User talk:Darkblood999

A tag has been placed on J. Powell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Xiahou 01:27, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to IGN, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: IGN was changed by Darkblood999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976279 on 2011-01-17T05:59:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Whitcomb Riley (train). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: James Whitcomb Riley (train) was changed by Darkblood999 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853947 on 2011-01-17T06:22:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wars of the Roses. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — GorillaWarfare talk 06:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Blake Griffin. — GorillaWarfare talk 06:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC) You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. — GorillaWarfare talk 06:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)