User talk:Darkfrog26

context
UI abstraction (I suspect the "a" should not be capitalised) means absolutely nothing to me. Unless you create the UI abstraction article, Jseamless will be deleteable under db-context. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 15:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

UI abstraction
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article UI abstraction, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jseamless
An editor has nominated Jseamless, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)